flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Name of Expression API and DataSet abstraction
Date Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:15:23 GMT
When consensus not happening we will go with VOTE. I think we have 2
candidates of names which are table and relation.

- Henry

On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org> wrote:

> I also prefer Relation. So what should we do? Doesn't really look like
> consensus.
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Paris Carbone <parisc@kth.se
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > Both names look ok but if I had to choose I would go for the Relation
> API.
> > It defines a new DSL in contrast to data types (ie DataSet, DataStream)
> so it doesn’t have to follow the same convention.
> > Plus, it is a single word with sufficient meaning.
> >
> > Paris
> >
> > On 21 Mar 2015, at 17:29, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com
> <javascript:;><mailto:fhueske@gmail.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> >
> > I'm in favor of Relation API because the API operates on a set of tuples
> > with a fixed (flat) schema which is known as relation from relational
> > databases.
> >
> > Everybody who took a database intro class should be familiar with this
> term.
> > On Mar 21, 2015 5:14 PM, "Henry Saputra" <henry.saputra@gmail.com
> <javascript:;><mailto:henry.saputra@gmail.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> >
> > I like the Relation or Relational. So maybe we could use DataRelation
> > as the abstraction?
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com
> <javascript:;><mailto:fhueske@gmail.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > I am also more in favor of Rel and Relation, but DataTable nicely follows
> > the terms DataSet and DataStream.
> > On Mar 16, 2015 4:58 PM, "Aljoscha Krettek" <aljoscha@apache.org
> <javascript:;><mailto:aljoscha@apache.org <javascript:;>>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > I like Relation or Rel, is shorter.
> > On Mar 16, 2015 4:52 PM, "Hermann Gábor" <reckoner42@gmail.com
> <javascript:;><mailto:reckoner42@gmail.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for DataTable
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@apache.org
> <javascript:;><mailto:trohrmann@apache.org <javascript:;>>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > +1 for DataTable
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Márton Balassi <
> > balassi.marton@gmail.com <javascript:;><mailto:balassi.marton@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > +1 for Max's suggestion.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> > mxm@apache.org <javascript:;><mailto:mxm@apache.org <javascript:;>>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thanks for starting the discussion. We should definitely not
> > keep
> > flink-expressions.
> >
> > I'm in favor of DataTable for the DataSet abstraction
> > equivalent.
> > For
> > consistency, the package name should then be flink-table. At
> > first
> > sight, the name seems kind of plain but I think it is quite
> > intuitive
> > because the API enables you to work in a SQL like fashion.
> >
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I think this is a very good suggestion. :-)
> >
> > (There is an associated issue, we shouldn't forget to close:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1623)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message