flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Márton Balassi <mbala...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Make a release to be announced at ApacheCon
Date Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:32:48 GMT
+1 for the early release.

I'd call it 0.9-milestone1.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 for a beta release: 0.9-beta.
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Paris Carbone <parisc@kth.se> wrote:
>
> > +1 for an early release. It will help unblock the samoa PR that has 0.9
> > dependencies.
> >
> > > On 26 Mar 2015, at 11:44, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzoumas@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 for an early milestone release. Perhaps we can call it 0.9-milestone
> > or
> > > so?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Two weeks have passed since we've discussed the 0.9 release the last
> > time.
> > >>
> > >> The ApacheCon is in 18 days from now.
> > >> If we want, we can also release a "0.9.0-beta" release that contains
> > known
> > >> bugs, but allows our users to try out the new features easily (because
> > they
> > >> are part of a release). The vote for such a release would be mainly
> > about
> > >> the legal aspects of the release rather than the stability. So I
> suspect
> > >> that the vote will go through much quicker.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I've reopened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1650
> because
> > >>> the issue is still occurring.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org>
wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Thursday, March 12, 2015, Till Rohrmann <till.rohrmann@gmail.com
> >
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Have you run the 20 builds with the new shading code? With
new
> > shading
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>> TaskManagerFailsITCase should no longer fail. If it still does,
> then
> > >> we
> > >>>>> have to look into it again.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> No, rebased on Monday before shading. Let me rebase and rerun
> tonight.
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message