flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Java/Scala order
Date Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:34:45 GMT
Then if no objections in 24 hours I'd open a JIRA issue for this.

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 for Scala :-)
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Márton Balassi <balassi.marton@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm strongly for consistency and personally would prefer Scala as a
> default
> > - thus making the shorter page the default.
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I think either way is fine as long as we are consistent.
> > >
> > > I have a slight bias for making Scala the default.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Hermann Gábor <reckoner42@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > The default language for the source codes in the documentation is
> Java
> > > (see
> > > > the Programming Guide
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/programming_guide.html
> > > > >),
> > > > but in blog posts (like Introducing Flink Streaming
> > > > <http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/02/09/streaming-example.html>)
> > Scala
> > > is
> > > > the default. I think it should be consistent.
> > > >
> > > > Scala is more concise, thus it might be better for longer source
> codes,
> > > but
> > > > Java is more widely used.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > It came up because we've been dealing with FLINK-1429
> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1429> (streaming Scala
> > > docs)
> > > > with Marton.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Gabor
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message