flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maximilian Michels <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Java/Scala order
Date Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:52:19 GMT
+1 for Scala as a default. Looks much less verbose.

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Márton Balassi <balassi.marton@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then if no objections in 24 hours I'd open a JIRA issue for this.
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 for Scala :-)
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Márton Balassi <balassi.marton@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm strongly for consistency and personally would prefer Scala as a
>> default
>> > - thus making the shorter page the default.
>> >
>> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I think either way is fine as long as we are consistent.
>> > >
>> > > I have a slight bias for making Scala the default.
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Hermann Gábor <reckoner42@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hey all,
>> > > >
>> > > > The default language for the source codes in the documentation is
>> Java
>> > > (see
>> > > > the Programming Guide
>> > > > <
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/programming_guide.html
>> > > > >),
>> > > > but in blog posts (like Introducing Flink Streaming
>> > > > <http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/02/09/streaming-example.html>)
>> > Scala
>> > > is
>> > > > the default. I think it should be consistent.
>> > > >
>> > > > Scala is more concise, thus it might be better for longer source
>> codes,
>> > > but
>> > > > Java is more widely used.
>> > > >
>> > > > What do you think?
>> > > >
>> > > > It came up because we've been dealing with FLINK-1429
>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1429> (streaming
Scala
>> > > docs)
>> > > > with Marton.
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers,
>> > > > Gabor
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>

Mime
View raw message