flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Make a release to be announced at ApacheCon
Date Thu, 26 Mar 2015 18:03:36 GMT
The ASF press team wants to announce next week, so a 3-day vote right now
might cancel the subject line of this thread :-)

Perhaps we can reach consensus in the DISCUSS thread or have a 24-hour vote?

I agree with Stephan on 0.9.0.M1 (or 0.9.0-m1 or whatever), as it seems
that other open source projects are using this naming scheme.

Kostas



On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:

> I think "Milestone" pretty much says that we have some crucial things in
> there, but not all. "Beta" in comparison, has an "immature early version"
> connotation.
>
> We are, for example, using a milestone 1 version of Jetty for the Web
> Frontend, so that is a pretty standard thing, in my opinion:
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.eclipse.jetty</groupId>
> <artifactId>jetty-server</artifactId>
> <version>8.0.0.M1</version>
> </dependency>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Looks like we need to vote on 0.9-beta or 0.9-milestone.
> >
> > Can we find consensus whether to add a 1 after the name? -beta1 or
> > -milestone1.
> > Adding a 1 allows us to create a second beta/milestone release.
> >
> > I'm against adding a 1.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 26 Mar 2015, at 11:01, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Two weeks have passed since we've discussed the 0.9 release the last
> > > time.
> > > >
> > > > The ApacheCon is in 18 days from now.
> > > > If we want, we can also release a "0.9.0-beta" release that contains
> > > known
> > > > bugs, but allows our users to try out the new features easily
> (because
> > > they
> > > > are part of a release). The vote for such a release would be mainly
> > about
> > > > the legal aspects of the release rather than the stability. So I
> > suspect
> > > > that the vote will go through much quicker.
> > >
> > > +1 for 0.9-beta
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message