flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Java/Scala order
Date Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:23:01 GMT
+1 for Scala :-)

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Márton Balassi <balassi.marton@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm strongly for consistency and personally would prefer Scala as a default
> - thus making the shorter page the default.
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I think either way is fine as long as we are consistent.
> >
> > I have a slight bias for making Scala the default.
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Hermann Gábor <reckoner42@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > The default language for the source codes in the documentation is Java
> > (see
> > > the Programming Guide
> > > <
> > >
> >
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/programming_guide.html
> > > >),
> > > but in blog posts (like Introducing Flink Streaming
> > > <http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/02/09/streaming-example.html>)
> Scala
> > is
> > > the default. I think it should be consistent.
> > >
> > > Scala is more concise, thus it might be better for longer source codes,
> > but
> > > Java is more widely used.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > It came up because we've been dealing with FLINK-1429
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1429> (streaming Scala
> > docs)
> > > with Marton.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Gabor
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message