flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Name of Expression API and DataSet abstraction
Date Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:30:04 GMT
I am also more in favor of Rel and Relation, but DataTable nicely follows
the terms DataSet and DataStream.
 On Mar 16, 2015 4:58 PM, "Aljoscha Krettek" <aljoscha@apache.org> wrote:

> I like Relation or Rel, is shorter.
> On Mar 16, 2015 4:52 PM, "Hermann Gábor" <reckoner42@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for DataTable
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for DataTable
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Márton Balassi <
> > balassi.marton@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for Max's suggestion.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> mxm@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for starting the discussion. We should definitely not
keep
> > > > > > flink-expressions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm in favor of DataTable for the DataSet abstraction equivalent.
> > For
> > > > > > consistency, the package name should then be flink-table. At
> first
> > > > > > sight, the name seems kind of plain but I think it is quite
> > intuitive
> > > > > > because the API enables you to work in a SQL like fashion.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > I think this is a very good suggestion. :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > (There is an associated issue, we shouldn't forget to close:
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1623)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message