flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Drafting a roadmap for Flink
Date Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:18:02 GMT
fwiw re: shell, this is just scala being incredibly useful. If anything,
spark is following scala. So is for example BIDMat/BIDMach (and, sigh*
mahout). I don't think differentiation means throwing away common baseline
tools, there's gotta be more than that. (I'm of course advocating using
shell in Mahout. flink having shell would mean online computations on par
with mahout's shell for spark).

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:

> I agree, Henry. To me, this is a low priority feature and not one in the
> main line of what I see as the core Flink direction.
> I included it in there, because it is actually a fairly low hanging
> fruit. Once the stuff for the Zeppelin Integration is in place, it is a
> neat project for someone (external) who likes a bit if Scala hacking.
> As such, we may actually move it to the "interesting projects on Flink"
> section of the Wiki, rather than have it in the roadmap.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message