flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Distributed TPC-H DataGenerator for flink-contrib
Date Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:02:45 GMT
I wrote them some time ago (like 12+ months) about the question whether we
can include TPCH sample data for our programs. They replied they were just
revising their license to allow that.

Should be possible now. Good idea to ping them again to make sure that it
is approved now and that it holds for code as well...

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org> wrote:

> Okay, thank you. I'll write a mail to tpc.org and ask which rules we have
> to respect.
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for reaching out to the TPC.
> >
> > It might also be that it is OK to add the code but not under the name
> > TPC-H.
> >
> > 2015-02-11 13:55 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Nice, this is a great tool. :)
> > >
> > > On 09 Feb 2015, at 17:05, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > However, the website is not really helpful:
> > > http://www.tpc.org/trademarks/
> > > >
> > > > As one data point, the Apache Calcite (incubating) project also
> depends
> > > on
> > > > the mentioned airlift/tpch repository:
> > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/blob/master/plus/pom.xml#L57
> > > > and
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/blob/master/plus/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/adapter/tpch/TpchSchema.java#L33
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > > How about adding a line to the NOTICE files acknowledging that TPC
> is a
> > > > registered trademark of the transaction processing council?
> > >
> > > I find it reasonable to add it to the NOTICE files as an
> acknowledgement.
> > >
> > > The trademark website says "For additional details please contact
> > > admin@tpc.org." If we want to be on the safe side, we could write an
> > > email and confirm.
> > >
> > > Any further opinions on this?
> > >
> > > – Ufuk
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message