flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Be more patient with PR and patches in the review
Date Thu, 05 Feb 2015 16:18:53 GMT
Ah awesome, I do not about that, thanks for letting me know. Mea culpa from me.

I think I saw only couple cases but thought I raise the discussions
before I forgot =P

Thanks for addressing this so quickly, Stephan.

- Henry

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey Henry!
> For pull request 344, I merged it, because I had already built a fix on top
> of it while discussion was going on.
> Here is the commit that addresses actually all comments in the discussion
> (plus a bit more)
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/56b7f85b4f6d522765df19a9710a098092ccde56
> It is applied two commits later than the pull request commit.
> It is true that I forgot to mirror that back into teh discussion. My bad!
> If you think that is happening for more pull requests, then please raise
> the issue, because that certainly should not happen.
> Greetings,
> Stephan
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> HI All,
>> I'd like to bring up a bit concerning flow I am start seeing in the few
>> PRs.
>> I see some PRs had been rush to commit without addressing ALL comments
>> in the PR review.
>> For latest example is the comments Till and I made about using Option
>> instead of null [1] for Max's PR.
>> It is responsibility of the PR creator to address comment raise up in
>> the PR before any commiter could merge it. No need to rush it.
>> Would like to see this more to make sure PRs' issue or concerns are
>> addressed.
>> Thanks,
>> - Henry
>> [1]  https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/344

View raw message