flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Including the streaming scala-api in the 0.8 release
Date Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:04:14 GMT
Good from my side!

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Márton Balassi <balassi.marton@gmail.com>
wrote:

> If no objections I'd like to merge the update during the afternoon.
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Márton Balassi <balassi.marton@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Well, cherry-picking was a bit longer than expected, but is finally
> ready.
> > [1]
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/282
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Marton
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyula.fora@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> We don't have any tests for the scala api yet, because in 95% it just
> >> wraps
> >> the java api, no new logic except for the aggregations which should have
> >> tests indeed. The api itself have proper docs we just didn't update the
> >> streaming-guide.
> >>
> >> But I think since the streaming api is still in a beta phase its better
> to
> >> have working features out for testing. This speeds up development a lot
> >> for
> >> us.
> >>
> >> This can be included in the release candidate even today, since its
> ready.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Do we have any tests for the scala streaming API ?
> >> > With tests and documentation missing there is very little time.
> >> >
> >> > I hope that we get the first release candidate out tomorrow.
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyfora@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Yes, we can cherry-pick it, thats not a problem.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Can you cherry-pick it onto the 0.8 branch?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > If that works well and the main streaming authors (Marton, Gyula,
> >> > Paris,
> >> > > > Jonas, Gabor, ...) back that decision, I would go for it.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyfora@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > +1
> >> > > > > I agree to include it, the only thing missing there is the
> >> streaming
> >> > > > guide
> >> > > > > for scala.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Paris Carbone <parisc@kth.se>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hello everyone!
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > While the 0.8 release is on its way, I would suggest
we also
> >> > include
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > > > latest streaming scala-api. It is fairly stable, at
least as
> >> stable
> >> > > as
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > current java streaming api it builds on and it looks
quite
> >> > > > > straightforward
> >> > > > > > as well for new users.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Given that the next release will take a while, we think
that
> it
> >> > will
> >> > > be
> >> > > > > > good to expose the scala api and get some feedback
early
> enough
> >> so
> >> > we
> >> > > > > make
> >> > > > > > further improvements for the next release. What do
you think?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Paris
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message