flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.8.0 (RC2)
Date Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:34:30 GMT
Hi Robert, yes you are right. Totally forgot about packaging the binaries.

- Henry

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes, there are two NOTICE files.
> They differ because bin and src releases require different licensing
> notices. (The bin NOTICE is bigger)
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ah, we have 2 copies of NOTICE file?
>> Can binary diet just use the same one from root to simplify update? I
>> believe the content is exactly the same.
>>
>> - Henry
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Yep. Marton, please make sure that you update both notice files
>> (directory
>> > root and in the folder for the binary distribution)
>> > Am 14.01.2015 17:04 schrieb "Henry Saputra" <henry.saputra@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> We need to use 2014-2015 [1]
>> >>
>> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
>> >>
>> >> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Márton Balassi <mbalassi@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hey guys,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015 and also
>> >> bump
>> >> > the inception year in the pom. [1]
>> >> >
>> >> > By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE:
>> >> >
>> >> > Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation
>> >> > Or
>> >> > Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
>> >> >
>> >> > I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015 version.
>> >> >
>> >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38
>> >> > [2]
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f
>> >> > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE
>> >> >
>> >> > The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra <
>> henry.saputra@gmail.com
>> >> > <javascript:;>>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Yes, we need new RC.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > - H
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org
>> >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because
release
>> >> > votes
>> >> > > > are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
>> >> > > > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start another
vote.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change
will be
>> >> > > minimal.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>

Mime
View raw message