flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.8.0 (RC2)
Date Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:47:51 GMT
The decision of the vote is to cancel this package.

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Robert, yes you are right. Totally forgot about packaging the binaries.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Yes, there are two NOTICE files.
> > They differ because bin and src releases require different licensing
> > notices. (The bin NOTICE is bigger)
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Ah, we have 2 copies of NOTICE file?
> >> Can binary diet just use the same one from root to simplify update? I
> >> believe the content is exactly the same.
> >>
> >> - Henry
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > Yep. Marton, please make sure that you update both notice files
> >> (directory
> >> > root and in the folder for the binary distribution)
> >> > Am 14.01.2015 17:04 schrieb "Henry Saputra" <henry.saputra@gmail.com
> >:
> >> >
> >> >> We need to use 2014-2015 [1]
> >> >>
> >> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Márton Balassi <mbalassi@apache.org>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Hey guys,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks for the updates. Let me update the notice file to 2015
and
> also
> >> >> bump
> >> >> > the inception year in the pom. [1]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > By the way which version do you prefer for NOTICE:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Copyright 2014 The Apache Software Foundation
> >> >> > Or
> >> >> > Copyright 2014-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I've found examples for both. [2,3] I prefer the 2014-2015 version.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-0.8/pom.xml#L38
> >> >> > [2]
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/6955f437f948ed1c87f6fbf81a8fae82fc3f336f
> >> >> > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/NOTICE
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The next release candidate is coming in the evening CET.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Henry Saputra <
> >> henry.saputra@gmail.com
> >> >> > <javascript:;>>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > Yes, we need new RC.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Also need to update year in NOTICE file to 2015.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > - H
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org
> >> >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > > I think we need to cancel this vote (cancel mail), because
> release
> >> >> > votes
> >> >> > > > are strictly tied to a  revision/commit hash.
> >> >> > > > Then, on the new hash (and signatures), we can start
another
> vote.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Many checks should be easy to redo, given that the change
will
> be
> >> >> > > minimal.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message