flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Forking off the 0.8 release branch.
Date Tue, 06 Jan 2015 20:03:34 GMT
It turns out that we received the new repo and the ldap group at the same
time - so I guess problem solved. ;)

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org> wrote:

> >
> > When you said "finish the release" meaning distribute/publish a TLP
> > release in the incubating branch repo?
>
>
> Marton did like 40% of the release work by now. I think it would be best if
> Marton gets his chance to finish the release. Sadly, the TLP migration
> seems to block it right now.
> The release will look like a TLP release even though our repo is called
> "incubator-flink". We already got our release directory, so the artifacts
> won't be published from the incubator.
> From my point of view only the ldap group + nexus setup is missing for a
> TLP release.
>
> Once we have our new repo, we can just push the release branch to that repo
> as well. The commit hash (thats the one really relevant for the release)
> won't change.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Márton,
> >
> > Yes, we could and should move to non-incubating repo. I think Robert
> > and Stephan are working with Infra to make it happen.
> >
> > My question is more should we wait till migration happen or should we
> > publish non-incubating release artifact to ASF diet and mvn central
> > from our incubating source repository instead.
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Márton Balassi <balassi.marton@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > I assume that infra graduation means that we can move to the
> > non-incubating
> > > repo as well.
> > >
> > > Also to the best of my knowledge the release is not connected to the
> > > incubating repo itself. Of course it can be listed on github as well,
> but
> > > what makes an apache release is that it can be downloaded from the
> apache
> > > distribution mirrors (where it is signed correctly) and from maven
> > central
> > > (provided by the apache repository infrastructure). But please correct
> me
> > > if I'm wrong.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Henry Saputra <
> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> When you said "finish the release" meaning distribute/publish a TLP
> > >> release in the incubating branch repo?
> > >>
> > >> - Henry
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Allright .. I've asked infra and they plan to do the graduation this
> > week
> > >> > ("hopefully today/tomorrow").
> > >> > If that is really going to happen in the next days, I would suggest
> to
> > >> let
> > >> > Marton finish the release. If there are any major delays due to
> INFRA,
> > >> I'll
> > >> > do the release.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Robert Metzger <
> rmetzger@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Thanks for the update.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Happy new year to everyone.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> It seems that we have to wait for INFRA to finish the LDAP group
> > >> creation
> > >> >> for the new TLP first, since this is connected to the maven
> > repository.
> > >> >> If nothing happened until Monday, I'll ask infra on their IRC
chat
> if
> > >> they
> > >> >> can resolve the LDAP group creation.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Robert
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Márton Balassi <
> > >> balassi.marton@gmail.com>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> Happy new year Flinkers,
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I'm sorry that I could not report any progress on the release
yet.
> > It
> > >> was
> > >> >>> finally clarified that we are actually blocked by the apache
> > >> >>> infrastructure
> > >> >>> at the moment. [1]
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8954
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Marton
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Henry Saputra <
> > >> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> > Thanks for the update Marton.
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>> > So with we are graduating it is coming as blessing but
> > unfortunately
> > >> >>> > adding more work to the release process.
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>> > Please do let us know if you need any help with the release.
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>> > - Henry
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Márton Balassi
> > >> >>> > <balassi.marton@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>> > > +1 on quickstart, I'm having a look at it tomorrow.
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > Robert also pointed out the the DISCLAIMER file
(for
> incubation,
> > >> >>> > currently
> > >> >>> > > also added to the distribution) is no longer needed
neither on
> > the
> > >> >>> master
> > >> >>> > > nor on the release branch. Other minor things in
the repo
> > regarding
> > >> >>> the
> > >> >>> > > graduation:
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > >   * Eliminating the incubating subscript from the
project
> > version
> > >> >>> > >   * Updating the the docs (mostly mentioned in variables,
> > >> sometimes in
> > >> >>> > > since given version that should not be changed)
> > >> >>> > >   * Updating the quickstart scripts (more related
to simply
> > >> releasing)
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > I'm deleting the DISCLAIMER from the repo and the
assemblies,
> > >> bumping
> > >> >>> the
> > >> >>> > > version and updating the parts of the docs that
can be done
> > prior
> > >> to
> > >> >>> the
> > >> >>> > > release.
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > As for the state of the relese: With the help of
Robert I have
> > >> >>> acquired
> > >> >>> > the
> > >> >>> > > necessary knowledge and set up the tools needed
for the
> > release. I
> > >> >>> have
> > >> >>> > > still minor issues with maven, but I'm confident
that the
> > solution
> > >> is
> > >> >>> > near.
> > >> >>> > > I also fell motivated to write down my experiences
in a
> > >> documentation
> > >> >>> to
> > >> >>> > > spare some time for up and coming release managers.
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > Best,
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > Marton
> > >> >>> > >
> > >> >>> > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
<
> > >> >>> aljoscha@apache.org>
> > >> >>> > > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >> +1
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> > >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Robert Metzger
<
> > >> rmetzger@apache.org
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >> > Hi guys,
> > >> >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >> > I vote to make this issue a release blocker:
> > >> >>> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1225
> > >> >>> > >> > Two users ran into the issue within 2 days.
The quickstart
> is
> > >> mean
> > >> >>> to
> > >> >>> > >> give
> > >> >>> > >> > new users a good experience.
> > >> >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Stephan
Ewen <
> > >> sewen@apache.org>
> > >> >>> > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >> >>
> > >> >>> > >> >> Hi!
> > >> >>> > >> >>
> > >> >>> > >> >> I forked a branch "release-0.8" and
bumped the master
> > version
> > >> to
> > >> >>> > >> >> "0.9-incubating-SNAPSHOT".
> > >> >>> > >> >>
> > >> >>> > >> >> The closure cleaner is merged. Robert
has opened a PR for
> > Kryo
> > >> - I
> > >> >>> > would
> > >> >>> > >> >> suggest to merge that to "master",
cherry-pick to
> > "release-0.8"
> > >> >>> and
> > >> >>> > >> then:
> > >> >>> > >> >> Merry releasing!
> > >> >>> > >> >>
> > >> >>> > >> >> Greetings,
> > >> >>> > >> >> Stephan
> > >> >>> > >> >>
> > >> >>> > >> >>
> > >> >>> > >> >>
> > >> >>> > >> >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Márton
Balassi <
> > >> >>> > >> balassi.marton@gmail.com>
> > >> >>> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >> >> >
> > >> >>> > >> >> > @Timo&Stephan: The streaming
code uses this since last
> > week
> > >> [1],
> > >> >>> > Timo
> > >> >>> > >> >> > starting working on the issue
prior way before that - so
> > it
> > >> also
> > >> >>> > has
> > >> >>> > >> to
> > >> >>> > >> >> do
> > >> >>> > >> >> > with the streaming team pushing
last minute features to
> be
> > >> >>> > honest...
> > >> >>> > >> >> >
> > >> >>> > >> >> > Then are we waiting for the Java
Clousure cleaner and
> the
> > >> Kyro
> > >> >>> > >> support, I
> > >> >>> > >> >> > guess.
> > >> >>> > >> >> > Aljoscha has already issued a
PR for the former, some
> > >> additional
> > >> >>> > >> testing
> > >> >>> > >> >> is
> > >> >>> > >> >> > needed from the looks of it. [2]
> > >> >>> > >> >> >
> > >> >>> > >> >> > [1]
> > >> >>> > >> >> >
> > >> >>> > >> >> >
> > >> >>> > >> >>
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-flink.git;a=commit;h=51c1f67791307c2b9355171f7398d104befc8de5
> > >> >>> > >> >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/pull/269
> > >> >>> > >> >> >
> > >> >>> > >> >> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:52 PM,
Timo Walther <
> > >> >>> flink@twalthr.com>
> > >> >>> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > >
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > Yes, I also think so. Stability
is more important.
> > >> >>> > >> >> > >
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > > Am 16.12.2014 um 17:46
schrieb Stephan Ewen <
> > >> >>> sewen@apache.org
> > >> >>> > >:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > > Yes, the fact that we
both did not realize that
> until
> > now
> > >> >>> sort
> > >> >>> > of
> > >> >>> > >> >> > reveals
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > > that there are more
implications than anticipated.
> > That
> > >> is
> > >> >>> > never
> > >> >>> > >> good
> > >> >>> > >> >> > for
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > > "last minute" patches.
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > > That's why I would like
to merge it into 0.8.1 and
> > 0.9,
> > >> >>> rather
> > >> >>> > >> than
> > >> >>> > >> >> > 0.8.0
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > > That gives the code
a bit more testing/use and us a
> > bit
> > >> more
> > >> >>> > time
> > >> >>> > >> to
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > > thoroughly think the
implications through.
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >> On Tue, Dec 16,
2014 at 5:30 PM, Timo Walther <
> > >> >>> > flink@twalthr.com
> > >> >>> > >> >
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >> Sorry I totally
forgot to check the streaming API.
> Do
> > >> they
> > >> >>> use
> > >> >>> > >> the
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >> getXXXReturnTypes()
methods of the TypeExtractor?
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> Am 16.12.2014
um 17:23 schrieb Robert Metzger <
> > >> >>> > >> rmetzger@apache.org
> > >> >>> > >> >> >:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> I've worked
on adding Kryo support to Flink
> today. I
> > >> would
> > >> >>> > >> really
> > >> >>> > >> >> > like
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > to
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> include this
into the release. Many users were
> > >> complaining
> > >> >>> > about
> > >> >>> > >> >> > this (
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-610).
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> I've based my
work on top of Timo's pull request.
> If
> > >> we're
> > >> >>> > not
> > >> >>> > >> >> going
> > >> >>> > >> >> > to
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> merge it, I
will have to rebase my code to the
> > current
> > >> >>> > master.
> > >> >>> > >> ...
> > >> >>> > >> >> > I'll
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >> try
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>> and see if its
easily doable.
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> On Tue,
Dec 16, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Stephan Ewen <
> > >> >>> > >> sewen@apache.org>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > wrote:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> Yes, one
thing I just realized is that the
> > streaming
> > >> API
> > >> >>> is
> > >> >>> > not
> > >> >>> > >> >> > aware
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > of
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> MissingTypeInfos
and it may cause weird behavior.
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> On Tue,
Dec 16, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Fabian Hueske <
> > >> >>> > >> >> fhueske@gmail.com>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> +1 for
stability first
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> 2014-12-16
16:50 GMT+01:00 Stephan Ewen <
> > >> >>> sewen@apache.org
> > >> >>> > >:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
I am currently working through the type hints
> > pull
> > >> >>> > request...
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
Right now, I actually think that we should
> > postpone
> > >> >>> this
> > >> >>> > for
> > >> >>> > >> the
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > next
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
bugfix release.
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
This pull request changes actually some tricky
> > >> >>> mechanisms
> > >> >>> > in
> > >> >>> > >> the
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > Java
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> API
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
(it delays the type information), which may
> have
> > >> >>> > implications
> > >> >>> > >> >> that
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > me
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> and
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
Timo have not fully caught now.
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
I don't feel Merging this last minute - this is
> > >> prone
> > >> >>> to
> > >> >>> > >> >> introduce
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> errors.
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
Any opinions on that?
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Stephan Ewen <
> > >> >>> > >> sewen@apache.org
> > >> >>> > >> >> >
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>
+1 for adding the closure cleaner...
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>
Am 16.12.2014 15:23 schrieb "Aljoscha
> Krettek" <
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > aljoscha@apache.org
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> :
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>
Do we want the Java Closure Cleaner in 0.8 as
> > well?
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Márton
> > Balassi
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>
<balassi.marton@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
Cool, thanks.
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Stephan
> > Ewen <
> > >> >>> > >> >> > sewen@apache.org
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
Hi!
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
The type hints PR is ready now, Timo made
> > some
> > >> >>> final
> > >> >>> > >> >> > adjustments
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>
yesterday
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
evening. I'll review and merge it now, then
> > we
> > >> can
> > >> >>> > fork
> > >> >>> > >> the
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> branch.
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
Cheers,
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
Stephan
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Márton
> > >> Balassi <
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>
balassi.marton@gmail.com
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
Hey,
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
Checking the PRs listed by Stephan it
> seems
> > >> every
> > >> >>> > import
> > >> >>> > >> >> one
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> has
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
been
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
merged. As for the optional ones the
> > following
> > >> two
> > >> >>> > are
> > >> >>> > >> >> still
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
pending:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
Add support for Subclasses, Interfaces,
> > >> Abstract
> > >> >>> > >> Classes as
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> POJOs
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
[FLINK-1245] Introduce TypeHints for Java
> > API
> > >> >>> > operators
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
Robert +1'd the TypeHints PR and Timo has
> > just
> > >> >>> > updated
> > >> >>> > >> it.
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> Should
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
we
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>
wait
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
for it?
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
Cheers,
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
Marton
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Ufuk
> > Celebi <
> > >> >>> > >> >> uce@apache.org
> > >> >>> > >> >> > >
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
wrote:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Stephan
> > Ewen
> > >> <
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> sewen@apache.org>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> ----------------------------------------------
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Important Pull Requests to merge:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> ----------------------------------------------
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
[FLINK-1287] LocalizableSplitAssigner
> > prefers
> > >> >>> > splits
> > >> >>> > >> with
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> less
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
degrees
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
of
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
freedom
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
[FLINK-1305] [FLINK-1304] Test for
> > >> >>> > HadoopInputWrapper
> > >> >>> > >> and
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
NullWritable
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
support
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Upgraded HBase addon to HBase 0.98.x and
> > new
> > >> >>> Tuple
> > >> >>> > >> APIs +
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> fix
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>
of
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
ExecutionEnvironment
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
(this is partially merged, there are a
> few
> > >> POM
> > >> >>> > entries
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>> missing
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>
for
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
Hadoop 1
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
support)
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
The first two PRs are still open. I will
> > have
> > >> a
> > >> >>> > look at
> > >> >>> > >> >> them
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> as
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>
well
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
(Robert already tested one).
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
@Robert:
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
Regarding the Hbase PR: Is it resolved by
> > >> 1b69749
> > >> >>> > >> ("Enable
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>
flink-hbase
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
module for hadoop1 build as well")?
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
It would be nice if had a look at the
> > >> remaining
> > >> >>> > >> important
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>> ones
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>
today.
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
:-)
> > >> >>> > >> >> > > >>
> > >> >>> > >> >> > >
> > >> >>> > >> >> >
> > >> >>> > >> >>
> > >> >>> > >>
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message