flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Forking off the 0.8 release branch.
Date Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:55:55 GMT
+1 on postponing if it introduces behaviour we don't fully understand

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
> I am currently working through the type hints pull request...
>
> Right now, I actually think that we should postpone this for the next
> bugfix release.
>
> This pull request changes actually some tricky mechanisms in the Java API
> (it delays the type information), which may have implications that me and
> Timo have not fully caught now.
>
> I don't feel Merging this last minute - this is prone to introduce errors.
>
> Any opinions on that?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> +1 for adding the closure cleaner...
>> Am 16.12.2014 15:23 schrieb "Aljoscha Krettek" <aljoscha@apache.org>:
>>
>> Do we want the Java Closure Cleaner in 0.8 as well?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Márton Balassi
>>> <balassi.marton@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Cool, thanks.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi!
>>> >>
>>> >> The type hints PR is ready now, Timo made some final adjustments
>>> yesterday
>>> >> evening. I'll review and merge it now, then we can fork the branch.
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Stephan
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Márton Balassi <
>>> balassi.marton@gmail.com
>>> >> >
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Hey,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Checking the PRs listed by Stephan it seems every import one has
been
>>> >> > merged. As for the optional ones the following two are still pending:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Add support for Subclasses, Interfaces, Abstract Classes as POJOs
>>> >> >
>>> >> > [FLINK-1245] Introduce TypeHints for Java API operators
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Robert +1'd the TypeHints PR and Timo has just updated it. Should
we
>>> wait
>>> >> > for it?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Cheers,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Marton
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org>
wrote:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > ----------------------------------------------
>>> >> > > > Important Pull Requests to merge:
>>> >> > > > ----------------------------------------------
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > [FLINK-1287] LocalizableSplitAssigner prefers splits
with less
>>> >> degrees
>>> >> > of
>>> >> > > > freedom
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > [FLINK-1305] [FLINK-1304] Test for HadoopInputWrapper
and
>>> >> NullWritable
>>> >> > > > support
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > Upgraded HBase addon to HBase 0.98.x and new Tuple APIs
+ fix of
>>> >> > > > ExecutionEnvironment
>>> >> > > > (this is partially merged, there are a few POM entries
missing
>>> for
>>> >> > > Hadoop 1
>>> >> > > > support)
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > The first two PRs are still open. I will have a look at them
as
>>> well
>>> >> > > (Robert already tested one).
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > @Robert:
>>> >> > > Regarding the Hbase PR: Is it resolved by 1b69749 ("Enable
>>> flink-hbase
>>> >> > > module for hadoop1 build as well")?
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > It would be nice if had a look at the remaining important
ones
>>> today.
>>> >> :-)
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>>
>>

Mime
View raw message