flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 0.7.1 maintenance release
Date Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:15:14 GMT
I looked through the commits since the last release and there is a huge
amount of improvements we could include.
I was thinking about limiting the commits for the bugfix release to a
absolute minimum. Only those issues users complained about or cause the
system not to work at all should be included in my opinion.
I would not include issues that cause bad performance, fix testcases or
code-style. I would rather prefer to aim for a 0.8 release soon (maybe a
Christmas or new year release ;) )

These are my candidates:

[FLINK-1154] Quickfix to kill TaskManagers in YARN mode.
 e46d14b4c7507b23f2c80e0d893cfff6f6c49bae
[runtime] CaseClassSerializer correctly treated as stateful
f66892d46d80d453a55fd0ae14095ee06275a55d
[runtime] Quick fix for error with unsupported ship strategy
87497b7235088b2220aa356a14cbff9d43d5dffb
[FLINK-1265] Fix user classloader bug for registerInputOutput() method
4a74f3281bd04ed76b911d2038ea8e3d9c0b7963
[FLINK-1252] Add support for serializing Date and Enums in the Java API
591f16dd8f80cc2a5b2fdc6654c3c2d625119faa
[FLINK-1251] Enums are now handled properly by the collection input format
8081ddc530e6c7b720da09ac0fca2095d70fdd36
[FLINK-1254] [compiler] Fix compiler bug for pipeline breaker placement
ce822bf7f5ec80df5d5a749b1439320af3fb8b18
[streaming] StreamExecutionEnvironment rework + user class loader fix for
cluster deployment 6867f9b93ec1ad9a627450c4fbd0b5ff98ef6148
[FLINK-1235] Compiler accepts iterations referenced from the static path of
other iterations 21b1b975ccb50e1831172894bde96c6d3269dc57



On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzoumas@apache.org> wrote:

> +1, thanks Marton!
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for Marton and the maintenance release.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Would be good to have different RM to give feedback how existing
> > > process working.
> > >
> > > Thanks for volunteering.
> > >
> > > - Henry
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Márton Balassi
> > > <balassi.marton@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> +1 There are a couple of streaming bugfix commits that I'd like to
> push
> > >> there.
> > >>
> > >> I would also like to volunteer as release manager.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >>
> > >> Marton
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hey all,
> > >>>
> > >>> I would like to discuss your view on having a 0.7.1 maintenance
> > release.
> > >>>
> > >>> Although there are no commits in the respective branches (except
> > >>> documentation updates), I think we already have a set of
> issues/fixes,
> > >>> which would be beneficial to have in a release.
> > >>>
> > >>> I vote to start collecting/cherry-picking issues to the respective
> > branch.
> > >>>
> > >>> – Ufuk
> > >>>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message