Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A1A317E46 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85938 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2014 09:47:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flink-dev-archive@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 85882 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2014 09:47:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flink.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flink.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85870 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2014 09:47:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:47:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.3] (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:46:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 84805 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2014 09:46:43 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:46:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-qc0-f179.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username ktzoumas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:46:42 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x3so3046538qcv.38 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 02:46:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.104.207 with SMTP id a73mr66540127qgf.56.1412070401727; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 02:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.97.132 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 02:46:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9B65F54B-2394-4327-8A8E-65F28A69ECA1@apache.org> References: <9B65F54B-2394-4327-8A8E-65F28A69ECA1@apache.org> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:46:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Keeping the reference to PACT compiler and Nephele names? From: Kostas Tzoumas To: "dev@flink.incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134f3ccb182a00504454279 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a1134f3ccb182a00504454279 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, the goal is to get rid of the Pact and Nephele references, as they do not reflect the current state in most cases. On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote: > Hey Henry, > > On 30 Sep 2014, at 07:38, Henry Saputra wrote: > > Do we want to keep the names or make it to generic terms like Flink > > modek and backend engine? > > I think the goal is to ultimately get rid of the names PACT and Nephele > and replace them by Flink. We already renamed (I hope all) user facing > parts of the system accordingly, but chose to do it in a lazy fashion for > the internals to avoid conflicts. > > > The reason I asked is that it could confuse new contributors that > > coming directly to Flink witour knowing background history of > > Stratosphere. > > I agree. > > =E2=80=93 Ufuk --001a1134f3ccb182a00504454279--