flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Changing Scala Version to 2.11.x
Date Tue, 26 Aug 2014 06:53:23 GMT
Ok, I think we should stick with 2.10 then for the time being. I found
another way to implement it and the Scala API will be very lean once I'm
done, so it shouldn't be to hard to move to 2.11 once we have to.

Aljoscha


On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Sebastian Schelter <ssc.open@googlemail.com
> wrote:

> Going to 2.11 also restricts user to libraries that already have a 2.11
> version available. Just my 2 cents.
>
> -sebastian
> Am 24.08.2014 11:31 schrieb "Till Rohrmann" <trohrmann@apache.org>:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Sean Owen <srowen@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > My £0.02 -- yes it's an incompatible change, and I think you should
> > > move to 2.11 sooner than later. It will get harder as time goes on and
> > > eventually you'll have to maintain some 2.xx support after moving
> > > ahead for some existing users. You have a load more latitude in
> > > incubation. Move fast / break things -- for now.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> aljoscha@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > It would require users to move to 2.11 as well. So this might not be
> > > such a
> > > > good move right now, but that is why I'm asking here.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Aljoscha
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Sebastian Schelter <ssc@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> What does this mean from a user perspective? I'm not sure whether
> most
> > > >> companies are already moving to Scala 2.11. I know from one large
> > > company
> > > >> that is only conducting the move from 2.9 to 2.10 right now.
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> Sebastian
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 08/23/2014 05:22 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1
> > > >>>   Am 23.08.2014 17:16 schrieb "Aljoscha Krettek" <
> > aljoscha@apache.org
> > > >:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  Hi,
> > > >>>> what do you guys thing about bumping to 2.11.x. Scala 2.10.x
has a
> > > nasty
> > > >>>> bug that has been biting me in the arse for years. Now that
I'm
> > > trying to
> > > >>>> bring the Scala API up to feature parity with the Java API
I'm
> again
> > > >>>> wrestling with the bug. (Something to do with type checking,
which
> > > keeps
> > > >>>> me
> > > >>>> from using an elegant solution using implicits. I can elaborate
if
> > you
> > > >>>> want.)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> This would require some changes in the existing Scala code
but
> they
> > > >>>> should
> > > >>>> be minor. Also, Scala is still a young and fast-moving language,
> so
> > > >>>> people
> > > >>>> should be used to bumping Scala versions often. By the way,
2.11.0
> > is
> > > >>>> from
> > > >>>> April 2014 and they had to minor releases since, so we are
up to
> > > 2.11.2
> > > >>>> now.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> What do you think?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>> Aljoscha
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message