flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Rules for LICENSE and NOTICE files in Apache Releases
Date Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:58:54 GMT
I split license and notice files between source and binary licenses.

The setup is now the following

1) ./LICENSE, ./NOTICE  - Source distribution license and notice, refers to
everything where the sources / files are contained in the project

2) ./flink-dist/src/main/flink-bin/LICENSE and NOTICE - Binary distribution
license and notice, all bits bundled in the binary packages (tgz)

3) ./DEPENDENCIES - Comprehensive file with all maven dependencies, their
licenses and notices

The dependencies file is not required by Apache, but I think it makes sense
to have this.

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:

> Below is a summary of a mail exchange between me and Justin, with respect
> to creating compliant LICENSE and NOTICE files
> -----------------------------------------
> For the LICENSE and NOTICE file, I was a bit confused with all the
> regulations
> Just follow the instructions here [1], your mentors should also be able to
> help, ask them to review the LICENSE/NOTICE files.
> , so I looked at examples and followed the likes of Cassandra and Spark,
> because I think that they are similar to Flink in the way they get used.
> Other projects may also have it wrong.
> With respect to bundled bits, the listed dependencies are all part of what
> Maven pulls
> Only the bits actually included in the source or binary bundle need to be
> referenced in the LICENSE and/or NOTICE.  Bits that are downloaded after
> that in the build process (via maven or otherwise) do not need to be
> referenced.
>  - source -> Bundles almost no external bits, only a few JavaScript / CSS
> pages
> So only those JS bits need to be in LICENSE/NOTICE, and that depends on
> there license as well.
>  - bin -> Bundles the bits in NOTICE and LICENSE
> So you may require different NOTICE and LICENSE files in the binary
> package.
> To the top-level LICENSE and NOTICE files, I added everything that is
> pulled my Maven
> That is not required, only the bits physically bundled in the release need
> to be included. Also note that Apache licensed bundled bits do not need to
> be added to the LICENSE file. Again see [1].
> because I think that people that include Flink via Maven can not be
> expected to search for the LICENSE and NOTICE in the binary release.
> I actually agree that knowing everything it depends on is useful, but it's
> not actually a legal requirement to add these to LICENSE or NOTICE. You
> only need to add the bits that are physically bundled.
> Can you help me with the confusion there? Do we need three LICENSE files
> (source, maven, bin) ?
> Just two I think one for the source bundle and one in the binary bundle.
> Hope that clears things up. If you have any other questions just ask me
> directly or on list and I'll try and help.
> Thanks,
> Justin
> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message