flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Feedback on first release candidate artifacts (0.6-incubating)
Date Mon, 04 Aug 2014 19:25:57 GMT
I think the important thing from my suggestion for NOTICE file is we
need to include additional NOTICE information from dependencies when
it is required.

Others could chime it but AFAIK dependencies from other ASF projects
do not need to be mentioned.

- Henry

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org> wrote:
> For the changelog, I would suggest to start with the next version, report
> changes from the first Apache version on.
> Concerning the NOTICE file, I tried to follow that guide. As far as as I
> understood it, we need to have the notices of all dependencies that we
> ship. I took a look at what some of the other Apache and Apache Licensed
> projects did (Netty, Spark, Derby) and tried to follow that style.
>    1.
>    For any dependency whose bits are bundled
>    <http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundled-vs-non-bundled>,
>    consider whether LICENSE and NOTICE need to be modified. (DO NOT modify
>    LICENSE or NOTICE for dependencies whose bits are not bundled.)

View raw message