flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Changing Scala Version to 2.11.x
Date Sun, 24 Aug 2014 18:31:01 GMT
+1


On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Sean Owen <srowen@apache.org> wrote:

> My £0.02 -- yes it's an incompatible change, and I think you should
> move to 2.11 sooner than later. It will get harder as time goes on and
> eventually you'll have to maintain some 2.xx support after moving
> ahead for some existing users. You have a load more latitude in
> incubation. Move fast / break things -- for now.
>
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > It would require users to move to 2.11 as well. So this might not be
> such a
> > good move right now, but that is why I'm asking here.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Aljoscha
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Sebastian Schelter <ssc@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> What does this mean from a user perspective? I'm not sure whether most
> >> companies are already moving to Scala 2.11. I know from one large
> company
> >> that is only conducting the move from 2.9 to 2.10 right now.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Sebastian
> >>
> >>
> >> On 08/23/2014 05:22 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>   Am 23.08.2014 17:16 schrieb "Aljoscha Krettek" <aljoscha@apache.org
> >:
> >>>
> >>>  Hi,
> >>>> what do you guys thing about bumping to 2.11.x. Scala 2.10.x has a
> nasty
> >>>> bug that has been biting me in the arse for years. Now that I'm
> trying to
> >>>> bring the Scala API up to feature parity with the Java API I'm again
> >>>> wrestling with the bug. (Something to do with type checking, which
> keeps
> >>>> me
> >>>> from using an elegant solution using implicits. I can elaborate if you
> >>>> want.)
> >>>>
> >>>> This would require some changes in the existing Scala code but they
> >>>> should
> >>>> be minor. Also, Scala is still a young and fast-moving language, so
> >>>> people
> >>>> should be used to bumping Scala versions often. By the way, 2.11.0 is
> >>>> from
> >>>> April 2014 and they had to minor releases since, so we are up to
> 2.11.2
> >>>> now.
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you think?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Aljoscha
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message