flink-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com>
Subject Re: Question on providing CDH packages
Date Fri, 15 Aug 2014 21:15:57 GMT
Sorry, apparently this was unclear, as others asked the same question.  
Flink hasn't had any Apache releases yet.  I was referring to the 
proposed release that Robert sent out, 


> Sean Owen <mailto:srowen@gmail.com>
> August 15, 2014 at 11:26 AM
> PS, sorry for being dense, but I don't see vendor packages at
> http://flink.incubator.apache.org/downloads.html ?
> Is it this page?
> http://flink.incubator.apache.org/docs/0.6-SNAPSHOT/building.html
> That's more benign, just helping people rebuild for certain distros if
> desired. Can the example be generified to refer to a fictional "ACME
> Distribution"? But a note here and there about gotchas building for
> certain versions and combos seems reasonable.
> I also find this bit in the build script, although vendor-specific, is
> a small nice convenience for users:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-flink/blob/master/pom.xml#L195
> Owen O'Malley <mailto:omalley@apache.org>
> August 15, 2014 at 11:01 AM
> As a mentor, I agree that vendor specific packages aren't appropriate for
> the Apache site. (Disclosure: I work at Hortonworks.) Working with the
> vendors to make packages available is great, but they shouldn't be hosted
> at Apache.
> .. Owen
> Sean Owen <mailto:srowen@gmail.com>
> August 15, 2014 at 10:32 AM
> I hope not surprisingly, I agree. (Backstory: I am at Cloudera.) I
> have for example lobbied Spark to remove CDH-specific releases and
> build profiles. Not just for this reason, but because it is often
> unnecessary to have vendor-specific builds, and also just increases
> maintenance overhead for the project.
> Matei et al say they want to make it as easy as possible to consume
> Spark, and so provide vendor-build-specific artifacts and such here
> and there. To be fair, Spark tries to support a large range of Hadoop
> and YARN versions, and getting the right combination of profiles and
> versions right to recreate a vendor release was kind of hard until
> about Hadoop 2.2 (stable YARN really).
> I haven't heard of any formal policy. I would ask whether there are
> similar reasons to produce pre-packaged releases like so?
> Alan Gates <mailto:gates@hortonworks.com>
> August 15, 2014 at 10:24 AM
> Let me begin by noting that I obviously have a conflict of interest 
> since my company is a direct competitor to Cloudera.  But as a mentor 
> and Apache member I believe I need to bring this up.
> What is the Apache policy towards having a vendor specific package on 
> a download site?  It is strange to me to come to Flink's website and 
> see packages for Flink with CDH (or HDP or MapR or whatever).  We 
> should avoid providing vendor specific packages.  It gives the 
> appearance of preferring one vendor over another, which Apache does 
> not want to do.
> I have no problem at all with Cloudera hosting a CDH specific package 
> of Flink, nor with Flink project members working with Cloudera to 
> create such a package.  But I do not think they should be hosted at 
> Apache.
> Alan.

Sent with Postbox <http://www.getpostbox.com>

NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or 
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately 
and delete it from your system. Thank You.

  • Unnamed multipart/related (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message