Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 725B418AAC for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53804 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2016 12:53:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 53776 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2016 12:53:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 53764 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2016 12:53:05 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:53:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 069ECC0185 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:53:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.57 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.57 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.329, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=extravision.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id whRLNoEbuVZn for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mta.extravision.com (mta.extravision.com [193.133.125.8]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 204965F640 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.122] ([192.168.2.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by mta.extravision.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id u1PCqsLN030458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:52:55 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=extravision.com; s=default; t=1456404775; bh=dK/Md+otX7vfCbg2iZm9xVwL2CFt/otZaenrUv8VmHE=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CBLQKvOOB9zhXgerRrfJ+wqSdGt2Z932TMO1Fv2FnObYmDtmt/Bdrqh/xcmAhbYak Gxy9b624BwVe8ZbvhdhdYXp9Ue1Pr+B01XT9fSOfvnLh7oQ5T246C5LLJt9b9Q6lcx /H/DmuGEIlzEuBWfdCabNhbU3cuDfL0w4mUf0H24= Subject: Re: HTML Canvas implementation of FlexJS? To: users@flex.apache.org References: <1456401282417-12049.post@n4.nabble.com> From: Tom Chiverton Message-ID: <56CEF926.5050601@extravision.com> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:52:54 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1456401282417-12049.post@n4.nabble.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040202020208000008050807" --------------040202020208000008050807 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit And thereby loosing any and all accessibility ? Also won't rendering to native controls will always be a better experience than drawing your own per-pixel effects ? Tom On 25/02/16 11:54, sta-ger wrote: > Would not it be more logical to implement all the process using HTML Canvas > and draw each component to it's 2d or WebGL context? I --------------040202020208000008050807--