Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58B3318F70 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:02:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95615 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2015 10:02:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 95588 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2015 10:02:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 95576 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2015 10:02:51 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:02:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5CF581A709B for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:02:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.9 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id isaQdYLp5wfj for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D71C120EFB for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so36095046wib.0 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:01:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=aT+GK8gRSEeqJyuCJM8UnKBAmuLu3172UxaYzyzHG5w=; b=FaHvfhxrW9V2/Wp8yKTIef/MgSjhz3oWnLkvbp/rRprK7mBwXDQiNwM2kCo5kiV2LU lbx3Gy9+3ntbgDsk9zPJGwE4F5D8xPlZNiWFT/XktZpsfq8O6L2XYWXH8fVZLEPyDDFV H8e1Ri7KW4pHz3DXA87pNo1bH9CD65nZa723ze0gHwZwAEpAUtmNJjz2jnAYkAFOX0Nh //9iQGYm2t4ARRSBc8PnFdDmi8GdpjUM8wXvz7TdGAHKcv+NfDs3FtVilJYlJPxR/jQL EPr5oCHsuGWdzNHy+KAi9WF27wwdTo6w2yzCRc/IDr29rYV9cIc2zSOu41o1gEwRPnqY rvJA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.95.71 with SMTP id di7mr6746847wjb.125.1436954513476; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.177.35 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:01:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55A62317.4030400@extravision.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:01:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Flex/Flash Viable still? From: Alain Ekambi To: "users@flex.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bea43d6559528051ae70b8e --047d7bea43d6559528051ae70b8e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bottom line is : As much as it s sad to admit. Interest in Flash based solutions(atleast web based one) is fading away rapidly. Even the Flex framework is more focusing to target HTML/CSS/JS than leveraging the Flash player. As someone who is still selling Flash based tools the future of Flash is definitely not web apps. People are using Flash only for features where HTML5 stlil suck (clienside file generation, video, drm, etc .. ). But for entire web apps ? Not so. Sadly On 15 July 2015 at 11:44, Angelo Lazzari wrote= : > Tom, you're right but this news is breaking in every tech/dev blog and > people who is not in IT world will keep in mind only the bad part of this > situation: "Flash is dangerous for your computer security".... > > Probably firstly Adobe and everyone of us should publicize the responsive > concept you said... a patch is already available ...with the same > propagation speed as this really bad news is doing in the IT world today.= .. > > Surely this breaking news is gold for every IT blogger and for the "no > flash" part of the IT world...and the problem will be that we probably > won't have a loud and firm response from Adobe to extinguish the fire thi= s > news fired up... > > Probably this is driven from some logic ( named world wide business) i > don't really understand.... > > As a friend of mine mailed me telling about the security bug news..we > should mail back to every mail like this, saying that what's happening to > flash today is happening every days world wide for almost every IT > product... but the great thing is that we have already a patch..because > Adobe is responsive as every great company.... > > my two cents.... > > Angelo > > > > > El mi=C3=A9., 15 jul. 2015 a las 11:08, Tom Chiverton () > escribi=C3=B3: > > > On 15/07/15 09:14, Nigel Hillier wrote: > > > Is there any point in continuing, if the security reputation is so po= or > > that > > > users have almost no choice but to uninstall ( or run it only on > > equipment > > > disconnected from real life, surrounded by firewalls, moats, Doberman > > dogs ) > > > > I don't think it's any worse than any other widely deployed product. > > At least Adobe are responsive and have a fix out the day after Mozilla > > jumped the gun and blocked the then-current version of the plugin. > > > > Tom > > > --=20 Alain Ekambi Co-Founder Ahom=C3=A9 Innovation Technologies http://www.ahome-it.com/ --047d7bea43d6559528051ae70b8e--