Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF93617356 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 02:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2315 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2015 02:35:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 2283 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2015 02:35:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 2267 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2015 02:35:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 02:35:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.1 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of omuppi1@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.51] (HELO mail-oi0-f51.google.com) (209.85.218.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 02:35:29 +0000 Received: by oier21 with SMTP id r21so25427246oie.1 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:33:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ttM8a6qG42kUzP0/081wiVBuCaSO2NhIsDWLfIGR+fw=; b=UNl+ZnAdn3AQJokLlJb7Zvtwnjy3CwRyT5sLRyqMIyjf/LHrb2+HmNJsGHXUso3myP CpvZVkMioAFreYIfWGgGvvsrXJK7D8trklQKcWHcuqv6CwaxQygk4A8bXaRGqXgAIZV0 0iZzuR580Ar/LyD2uWPtE5oHk5+Ku9WaSLV7nglIDh+CX4YJg2KNvq6Jeba1JRK8AKgi wTOlOknNVYzeEq4KEZW6gplkZAjJqrEy6VwbEDfmVyVvVXhcqziGJqMv4+ooCHS0dQJs 3eLLSnC5cpn7YqMNN6BzC5z790Phn+7wSqkiATUWMbD1DEx/esBz5/6oC3q6ZZupOSer GLig== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.221.229 with SMTP id qh5mr29449473obc.57.1426646019181; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:33:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: omuppi1@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.229.76 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:33:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.229.76 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:33:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1426642738289-9808.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1426642738289-9808.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:33:39 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wp-H2R-RfEnnV3IaPQObmnGSZuc Message-ID: Subject: Re: weird Radio Button UI with mobile project using 4.14 SDK? From: OmPrakash Muppirala To: users@flex.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c309243192c8051186e9a3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c309243192c8051186e9a3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 That's the new skin for the mobile radio button. So yes, it is expected behavior :-) Thanks, Om On Mar 17, 2015 7:21 PM, "Chris Ellem" wrote: > has anyone else seen this...? > > the radio button UI is different.. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/weird-Radio-Button-UI-with-mobile-project-using-4-14-SDK-tp9808.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --001a11c309243192c8051186e9a3--