Mailing-List: contact users-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@flex.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of markzolotoy@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1423829008016.91007@c-ware.de>
References: 
 <CAKNADY01_9sQ17G+q1tg=h3JngD-854GLZUgVfto=7g9UviAPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<3B3852E122320F4CA9F2A2688F34E361AEB10167@ORD2MBX01D.mex05.mlsrvr.com>
	<1423829008016.91007@c-ware.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:10:00 -0600
Message-ID: 
 <CAKNADY1ZuB+_yXMyS9BLMxzu02tjcy=Xb7Tq4Z1m3xJ7BjWbOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ranorex
From: mark goldin <markzolotoy@gmail.com>
To: users <users@flex.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e3e0ac8d87d050ef8ca52

--047d7b2e3e0ac8d87d050ef8ca52
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Thanks for the links. Will have a look.

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
wrote:

> Well if you think about QTP it's actually extremely cheap :-)
>
> I tried both tools some time ago and would prefer RiaTest out of the set
> of those tools as I could write my tests in Java (JUnit, TestNG) and
> include the tests in my Maven CI build.
>
> BUT ... my favorite tool still is SilkTest/Silk4J as this simply worked
> best when I did the evaluation ... it has been reported that the newer
> Selenium WebDriver versions aren't bad, but I haven't tried the Flex
> support in some years ;-)
>
> Chris
>
> PS: Quite old, but it should still be a good starting point:
> https://dev.c-ware.de/confluence/display/PUBLIC/Functional+Testing+Tools
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: Jason Taylor <jason@dedoose.com>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2015 20:22
> An: users@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: RE: Ranorex
>
> it works, but is incredibly expensive. We have found RiaTest suits our
> needs far better.
> ~ JT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mark goldin [mailto:markzolotoy@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 7:45 AM
> To: users
> Subject: Ranorex
>
> Anyone can share any experience using Ranorex tool?
>
> Thanks
>

--047d7b2e3e0ac8d87d050ef8ca52--