flex-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nigel Magnay <nigel.mag...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Ranorex
Date Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:14:32 GMT
We use Ranorex, but drive it via the robot framework, so integrates well
into CI tooling.

Works for us.



On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de
> wrote:

> Well if you think about QTP it's actually extremely cheap :-)
>
> I tried both tools some time ago and would prefer RiaTest out of the set
> of those tools as I could write my tests in Java (JUnit, TestNG) and
> include the tests in my Maven CI build.
>
> BUT ... my favorite tool still is SilkTest/Silk4J as this simply worked
> best when I did the evaluation ... it has been reported that the newer
> Selenium WebDriver versions aren't bad, but I haven't tried the Flex
> support in some years ;-)
>
> Chris
>
> PS: Quite old, but it should still be a good starting point:
> https://dev.c-ware.de/confluence/display/PUBLIC/Functional+Testing+Tools
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: Jason Taylor <jason@dedoose.com>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2015 20:22
> An: users@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: RE: Ranorex
>
> it works, but is incredibly expensive. We have found RiaTest suits our
> needs far better.
> ~ JT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mark goldin [mailto:markzolotoy@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 7:45 AM
> To: users
> Subject: Ranorex
>
> Anyone can share any experience using Ranorex tool?
>
> Thanks
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message