Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2059FCE9A for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 18:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94192 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2015 18:28:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 94162 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2015 18:28:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 94141 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2015 18:28:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 18:28:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of dmoshal@gmail.com does not designate 162.253.133.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [162.253.133.43] (HELO mwork.nabble.com) (162.253.133.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 18:28:02 +0000 Received: from mjoe.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.57]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B92FEA4E6 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 10:27:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 10:25:36 -0800 (PST) From: DavidM To: users@flex.apache.org Message-ID: <1420741536489-9357.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: upgrading old application - expressInstall.swf vs playerProductInstall.swf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I've been upgrading an old (2011) flex app and, as an experiment, decided to generate a new application with Flash Builder 4.7 and compare with that generated in 2011 using Flash Builder 4.5. This is what I discovered: identical: index.template.html completely different: swfobject.js additionally the file: playerProductInstall.swf is replaced by: expresinstall.swf So, my question is this: is it recommended to replace the files: swfobject.js and playerProductInstall.swf with the newer swfobject.js and the expresinstall.swf Thanks David -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/upgrading-old-application-expressInstall-swf-vs-playerProductInstall-swf-tp9357.html Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.