Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 677D410E62 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:54:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63170 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2014 16:54:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 62865 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2014 16:54:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 62857 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2014 16:54:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 16:54:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [74.125.82.177] (HELO mail-we0-f177.google.com) (74.125.82.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 16:54:01 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u57so537361wes.36 for ; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:53:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=ItIqzrLglDMhfIaqVoLtvLO92Sr/fxUtrRO92NBcoBc=; b=kGtiUIE3Q1dIkotfJKlwpNLqe4kBEWtwAjQ7opeQS7wk5x4UEI4iCFGowImwVrjS7L brlqo2jyWUVLA2ledG2K2vtJXvk39oLYXQ86IOPzi0yXiBybl6BBiqAj60C4yU5skGbf p+2/c476oUma3KskeAQN+O2A4fBLUaZJrq41LyUIdq7rMG2Ztsme8ikjnsivA3hkqGwr 1wxAido5CknKAgUND91kHRxMpKkOnpfopmUtrJtGue7V3xlQidMEVZRgwrcm6v+G2d+Z uOAKncXY/eT69QgZAPsm7SkiaSYITOjpA7gQSDBPsJmCt7ViNMAtRmuRCwBosstEIrYd JJ6w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmxpjvi8eZy/Td5yAPJvUzfoQB3MDkupRyLnxbS48GZOHczJp/bsZtC/wODh1L8ZSpHzr2Q X-Received: by 10.194.204.199 with SMTP id la7mr2597230wjc.4.1396457618952; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:53:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.20.200 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 09:53:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [93.126.129.121] In-Reply-To: <7A3C34B9-E215-4D03-84EA-25D19ABDA397@4ctv.com> References: <5332EB22.8080605@leeburrows.com> <533BFED4.1050907@extravision.com> <533C0284.7030906@extravision.com> <7A3C34B9-E215-4D03-84EA-25D19ABDA397@4ctv.com> From: Ronny Shibley Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 19:53:18 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Spark Datagrid with Multiple Columns To: "users@flex.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bae478e526b8a04f6122039 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bae478e526b8a04f6122039 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yes a very specific reason, the scrolling starts lagging once you have 500 columns with 100 rows in a spark datagrid with column width 30px and column height 30px. Lots of item renderers... I'm not saying its not performant, because it is and it renders pretty fast... but the scrolling is not not smooth at all... it lags... especially on a laptop. In my use case... I need super fast scrolling because my whole application is based on a Calendar. Kind Regards, Ronny Shibley, Eng Software Architect | Codefish | www.codefish.com t +961 5 450824 | m +961 70 250650 On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Julio Carneiro wrote: > any specific reason for not using Datagrid, which already has a pretty > decent multi-column support? > > On Apr 2, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Ronny Shibley wrote: > > > Yes i simulated columns in my list item renderer... basically just drew > > some cells with a fixed width.... > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > > > Ronny Shibley, Eng > > > > > > > > Software Architect | Codefish | www.codefish.com > > > > t +961 5 450824 | m +961 70 250650 > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Tom Chiverton > wrote: > > > >> On 02/04/14 13:22, Ronny Shibley wrote: > >> > >>> If so, yes the rows were not the issue, it's the number of columns... > >>> > >> I though this was with a List item renderer, so there are no columns, > just > >> a bunch of stuff in a HorizontalLayout ? > >> > >> Tom > >> > > -- > Julio Carneiro > > > --047d7bae478e526b8a04f6122039--