Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB98510950 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81272 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2014 14:55:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 81219 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2014 14:55:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 81199 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2014 14:55:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:55:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [209.85.212.177] (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:55:39 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cc10so1930494wib.10 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 07:55:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=vAi4bxUaMIrmnEkz7ZaMUEitTEDA2ikszxjTPBicYQs=; b=EOPKfgPs1OgViqsAF9Cz+xFmFQrZvlDaWKGfF3UzX8s44TqN7F2wbD0wmTHvKCkskY XtkX08ngeJbsuWel6I7ejnp3MqrxQpEGN5zBIx78/JW0x4UxVo8ZwM71hhS1bH8by6U6 2DdsYJI50Roe0dXy3RqWIkz5oDujqO+N5TLN08WddaWrZCN7sH1ssghobiM9zv0QjXKf I6Kn44r0bENeySrB0ywtpKdLB+4giQbHnxvGXQkLg07BkIyrgZpwzZKhIrmarOqAmt8f ITReyKdLrSvz0c3Rfq59Y6hYGW1LqKOFtO31DQMCwJVcHTOneMg7Vaz7y/jvA7WRMMh5 nadg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlKjyW18QyVQaoBGwFCRsIUNWtO14+bx2WAhvFDjpPC5U9XVhyBYJ0xNt3ABtCUUZLyUf48 X-Received: by 10.180.21.225 with SMTP id y1mr30510599wie.24.1395845717416; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 07:55:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.20.200 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 07:54:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [93.126.128.113] From: Ronny Shibley Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:54:57 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Spark Datagrid with Multiple Columns To: "users@flex.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb7098825fb2804f583a879 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bb7098825fb2804f583a879 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Flex User, I have a spark DataGrid with 100+ columns with 100+ Rows. My Item Renderers are as lean as they can get but i still have small hiccups while scrolling vertically and horizontally. I have also used all the obvious performance improvements: variableRowHeight="false", opaqueBackground, etc... Basically I have come to the following conclusion: I don't want to recycle my ItemRenders I would rather wait couple of seconds. My Question is the following: 1- Is there a special way to Draw the whole Grid with all the ItemRenderers at once, Basically useVirtualLayout=false ? 2- Would it be more performant to use a s:List instead as i don't need the functionalities of a Grid ? Kind Regards, Ronny Shibley, Eng Software Architect | Codefish | www.codefish.com t +961 5 450824 | m +961 70 250650 --047d7bb7098825fb2804f583a879--