Mailing-List: contact users-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@flex.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.208 as permitted sender)
From: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
To: "users@flex.apache.org" <users@flex.apache.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:50:37 -0800
Subject: Re: EULA or SaaS agreement for Flex browser-based (e.g. plug-in;
 not AIR) app?
Thread-Topic: EULA or SaaS agreement for Flex browser-based (e.g. plug-in;
 not AIR) app?
Thread-Index: Ac7ih2dPTHS79LsMQSiWYzeEqMpXaw==
Message-ID: <CEAC38F2.11BDB%aharui@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <6C19DA1E-7978-4295-93EA-90F59A1C11D5@classsoftware.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.6.130613
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

I am not a lawyer either, and I agree with Justin that there is probably
no license agreement required, but I believe that many sites have "terms
of use" or "terms and conditions" that you often have to accept or accept
by using or continuing on into the app.  It isn't a license, per-se, but
other legal stuff about liability.

On 11/15/13 3:09 PM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I'm not a lawyer but I would assume that no licence (except the one you
>licence your application under if any) would be required as the user
>would of already agreed to the Flash Player license when it was
>installed. [1]
>
>Thanks,
>Justin
>
>1.=20
>http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/legal/licens
>es-terms/pdf/Flash%20Player_11.0.pdf