Return-Path: 
 <users-return-2807-apmail-flex-users-archive=flex.apache.org@flex.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 839F6106D1
	for <apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue,  3 Sep 2013 07:04:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 11262 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2013 07:04:57 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@flex.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11104 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2013 07:04:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@flex.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@flex.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@flex.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.flex.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@flex.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@flex.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11096 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2013 07:04:56 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 07:04:56 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of paul.hastings@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 07:04:46 +0000
Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id rr4so5541105pbb.6
        for <users@flex.apache.org>; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version
         :to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=FRK3rKVJ/Q1SJZCxrQBdoE0szmgFzl6lEvSV42OzmXE=;
        b=Py4cpOXOWhsv2RK+b1K5Fqrlijeloph1u8rIL+h2CxXeuHSzMvuPPjyLGPfd9VLJ7S
         EUeDHO10zb2K9NJYRgoiSzTf9ruzvvXRyKWRkFVnrcRgMOmhk+cRem9sLzmXAMsIfz1j
         llMcGsAEeQqPawCbFl4P0zcigaBv7DxyRUNORNw9zrMmlJ8Cll8QNLFESP9F0H7sXtoM
         zePRdEVjwEZVfEqaSjwcapczMhLYSUNPcoveAvotgIyhTUQynGpNVzMbssZowArqDRlZ
         6uHswiRTBfTnwBk4RXfFkKW7rpab6Us9Pvmt4XiXZ0kk/dFLxdfkzEqTbsLsCIo7WvTp
         RXzw==
X-Received: by 10.68.252.106 with SMTP id zr10mr29942442pbc.63.1378191865046;
        Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.55] (ppp-124-122-87-164.revip2.asianet.co.th.
 [124.122.87.164])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 ta10sm21941636pab.5.1969.12.31.16.00.00
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <522589F5.90804@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:04:21 +0700
From: Paul Hastings <paul.hastings@gmail.com>
Reply-To: paul.hastings@gmail.com
Organization: Sustainable GIS Co Ltd
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: another chart & module issue?
References: <CE4ABDCF.11849%aharui@adobe.com> <522571BE.9060702@gmail.com>
 <67022A01-2087-4C0F-8D2A-165D5D89C54C@classsoftware.com>
 <52257C74.4010808@gmail.com>
 <FBAEAC8D-ECDB-4B8F-932D-43C68A63EAC8@classsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <FBAEAC8D-ECDB-4B8F-932D-43C68A63EAC8@classsoftware.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 9/3/2013 1:49 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> 4.10.0 release should look like this:
>
> <flex-sdk-description>
> <name>Apache Flex 4.10.0 FP11.1 AIR3.7 en_US</name>
> <version>4.10.0</version>
> <build>20130801</build>
> </flex-sdk-description>

what i have here is the same:

<flex-sdk-description>
<name>Apache Flex 4.10.0 FP 11.8 AIR 3.8 en_US</name>
<version>4.10.0</version>
<build>20130801</build>
</flex-sdk-description>

> The ideal way would be to compare MD5/signature of what was downloaded with the official release, but I assume the installer removed that.

is there official signature available? i can check to see if the installer 
removed, it matches, etc.

to me this is kind of a cosmetic problem as the RSL works no matter what its 
called (i messed up editing the file name in the flex config file & it just spat 
out charts.swf & the module worked fine w/it). i'm slightly more concerned about 
the "magical" nature of the charts RSL--needing to be in same location as 
modules using it vs none of the other RSL behaving the same. but neither are 
real show stoppers for me (right now).