Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AAE810316 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2260 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2013 19:18:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 2237 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2013 19:18:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 2229 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2013 19:18:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:18:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of danielfaq@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.178] (HELO mail-pd0-f178.google.com) (209.85.192.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:18:17 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w10so1829947pde.37 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:17:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ZHPnPmM55Dv9agqUXgKKx9BdK0pOLGkwRtZSB56bqGs=; b=VaU3AvB67KyEO/EYyOU0o4EtBD4buVYZDviikpdigOHcUlMyvsypv3S11vkIdhKkex L0JMxoWMhZPULhKif3zsWOxLYg31mV07kg7wph6wQVb5OE/NykmZfI4ZzJBPAh8VMbLn n3rBS9Mbo0qHC+CrUYUFKYcpXyWLTLkuHV3g5dhLbNbGXrpNDgJ+RNnpy7tE5NH1VWHy 31yfsx6rvfc56oeoc7nf4Cwcs1WHEPTmHGIpbeoe7sZnRyg1P0TSe5/6i1CvTU9UBJex jDCCLNqM0TOgUIzj8CfUBM2XHgDStI3SqPb7NcEVD0GzjKC9gXXIjkG66Boz4lB2APzj JGPQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.162.195 with SMTP id yc3mr17248956pab.64.1376162277631; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.236.138 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:17:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <52068160.6070004@dot-com-it.com> Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 16:17:57 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: IDE for Apache Flex From: Daniel D To: users@flex.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6dc1a8b62c1704e39cbf33 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b6dc1a8b62c1704e39cbf33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Daniel D Date: 2013/8/10 Subject: Re: IDE for Apache Flex To: users@flex.apache.org Cc: jeffry@dot-com-it.com And another, Flex runs with several backend languages, IntelliJ only works with Java? I do not know, Eclipse runs with Java, PHP, C, C + +, Pearl, Python,. .. NET etc. .. just install the plugins, I think the eclipse platform to develop a better IDE. Thanks. 2013/8/10 Daniel D > Hello Matt, > > I do not know IntelliJ, but I've heard it, I'm User of Eclipse and would > not trade for anything. Flash Builder is excellent, but in version 4.7 > 64-bit, removed the design view. My computer is 64 bit, but I have to use > version 4.6 32-bit for it. > > I believe that an IDE based on Eclipse 32 or 64 bits easy to use, free, > Opensource, popularize Apache Flex, which has been losing a lot for HTML5. > > Thanks. > > > 2013/8/10 Mathieu St-Gelais > >> I understand your point. If you're already paying for Flash Builder, you >> could instead pay for IntelliJ (approximately the same price). It is, in >> my >> opinion, a brilliant IDE and it works great with Apache Flex. >> >> Mat >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Daniel D wrote: >> >> > I would love to participate in an open source project, but I have no >> > experience in creating plugins for Eclipse or time to learn now, but I >> > think an IDE with good resources becomes more attractive language for >> new >> > programmers. window components and drag components. the problem is the >> > alignment of the components, it takes a long compile to see the swf in >> the >> > browser. >> > >> > I program in Java and Flex to 8 years, and use Flash Builder 4.6 in 32 >> bit >> > mode, not like the 4.7 64-bit. >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > >> > 2013/8/10 Jeffry Houser >> > >> > > On 8/10/2013 1:48 PM, Daniel D wrote: >> > > >> > >> The Apache will create an IDE for Flex, based on Eclipse 64 bit ? >> > >> >> > > >> > > I have not heard of any plans to create a full fledged IDE. But, if >> you >> > > think this is important, I strongly encourage you to start. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Because the latest version of Adobe Flash Builder 4.7 64 bit is >> > horrible, >> > >> removed the display design for mxml, why? >> > >> >> > > We have been told that design view was removed because it was very >> > > difficult to update; was not flexible enough to support multiple >> versions >> > > of Flex; and was very rarely used by developers. >> > > >> > > If memory serves me; there was an AIR Based replacement for design >> view >> > > that was demoed relatively recently. >> > > >> > > You are more than welcome to create one or start one if you think it >> is >> > > important. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Jeffry Houser >> > > Technical Entrepreneur >> > > http://www.jeffryhouser.com >> > > 203-379-0773 >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > --047d7b6dc1a8b62c1704e39cbf33--