Return-Path: 
 <users-return-2446-apmail-flex-users-archive=flex.apache.org@flex.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD71410A65
	for <apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:04:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 29371 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2013 00:04:30 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@flex.apache.org
Received: (qmail 29345 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2013 00:04:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@flex.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@flex.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@flex.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.flex.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@flex.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@flex.apache.org
Received: (qmail 29337 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2013 00:04:30 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:04:30 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [209.85.128.170] (HELO mail-ve0-f170.google.com)
 (209.85.128.170)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:04:24 +0000
Received: by mail-ve0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 15so106901vea.15
        for <users@flex.apache.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent
         :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=3k59TBCraNAmfTv4IitkdSb0WfB9vg617XAgM4TN4Fs=;
        b=Utai4PqMkZXKvoBpBW0pqf8D+7giVq8sPVX6CWal7ico8Wy/98Yg1DjwqcGKJcBECB
         Awq+a2leDs5oUX8ZfqFIHV0N/BQE/cWohG8o+gm8soKlnTQ57UxBZYjOfEnNk1wp4p8f
         7JZvNgJZR6bDPSHo5iWI4qzaNCSVnXGzN+7ZhHfOW2iz8mQFDR9s2xyZrFipBEwZNwbw
         upNQfRTdv+PmGNRhe4Ff70Aw/gNP0t8z3Ms5jLzXkalQ0WgdxmmO41z9E6fwHcIzxMpa
         JoHw3YnsIHVvig4H+Px6QvE3mOLXQGpt2q2hjImrAd5wiBlQ2mdMlRY/Ahy36bl1pfaz
         tbww==
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQkmGgeBb/0i5jlwMIgQ1EZBVVaLUJpmYV0gYLZu8SyFkeRErEjEWA9dl96aqFnfThz0ZzU2
X-Received: by 10.58.73.202 with SMTP id n10mr11896058vev.7.1376525023836;
        Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.7] (108-198-250-178.uvs.wlfrct.sbcglobal.net.
 [108.198.250.178])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 ww6sm32888249vec.5.2013.08.14.17.03.42
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <520C1ADA.9090605@dot-com-it.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:03:38 -0400
From: Jeffry Houser <jeffry@dot-com-it.com>
Reply-To: jeffry@dot-com-it.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@flex.apache.org
CC: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
Subject: Re: Compatibility - Adobe Flash Builder
References: <CE315149.FE43%aharui@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE315149.FE43%aharui@adobe.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 8/14/2013 6:36 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> On 8/14/13 2:45 PM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I still think we have to be careful about this statement.  With FB 4.6
>>> there is an HTML wrapper issue that can bite someone.
>> But for day to day development work there no issue there.
> Maybe not for you, but at least one person has already tripped over this.
> And since another failure case can happen after deployment, I think folks
> should be aware that FB 4.6 has more issues than FB 4.7.
>
>> I  can't recall a single web project I've worked on that didn't use a
>> custom HTML wrapper.
> That's great, but folks still have to be careful in how they customize the
> HTML wrapper.
>
> FlashBuilder 4.6 is looking to copy playerProductInstall.swf from the
> SDK's templates folder into your output folder.  Apache Flex switched to
> SWFObject's expressInstall.swf for licensing reasons.  The default .html
> file for Apache Flex will reference expressInstall.swf.  FlashBuilder 4.6
> will not copy that file.  IIRC, as long as you have the right FP
> installed, the wrapper will work fine, but if an upgrade is needed, I
> think it won't work.
>
> And if you use old HTML wrappers that reference playerProductInstall.swf
> to wrap Apache Flex SWFs you will also find that swf missing if an upgrade
> is needed.
>
> -Alex
>


-- 
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
203-379-0773