Mailing-List: contact users-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@flex.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=professorfripples.com; h=
	message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=
	professorfripples.com; b=f6mb/SjWsrxe/GeN2rGkGqHx9gJsFy6AmhhWAeW
	aXs5bU1z5S/CTCI/dFI9bRyj/JKvpyQ/hyu+IXa2fb1e2EJrEokQVTFBWxYyQYNc
	Uvv3EbnPITgr1ECqCI5Z1atswA5yghbMmypGMNEDBs1cQ5C02S+OwJ6hJTM3ZphA
	f1BQ=
Message-ID: <F0197B9ACC3646ACAE98A9353C92F637@intoxobox>
From: "David Hamiter" <intoxopox@professorfripples.com>
To: <users@flex.apache.org>
References: <805578EC-C609-4B7D-8C4C-0B6E642FDF5D@classsoftware.com>
 <CE00AC2D.CD6C%aharui@adobe.com>
 <CAGgUee1893d2Z25T965-VeqTJbbiHoVHXPhkcEKX-FrTZ15pQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGgUee1_cgN6CEhF3ZSrXp=E==d4A9XvU6zT6sz9zD-+hSYetg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGgUee1_cgN6CEhF3ZSrXp=E==d4A9XvU6zT6sz9zD-+hSYetg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bigger swfs in 4.9.1
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:08:07 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Importance: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sorry to be a bit off topic, but I'm curious, Jo=E3o... where did you fin=
d=20
Flex SDK 4.5.2? Was that a nightly build or something? The only official =
4.5=20
I can find is 4.5.1.21328A. If your copy of 4.5.2 appears stable, I would=
=20
love to get a copy of it.

David Hamiter

-----Original Message-----=20
From: Jo=E3o Fernandes
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 4:27 AM
To: users@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: bigger swfs in 4.9.1

Ok, I've compared size-report from 4.5.2 and 4.9.1 and I'm noticing that
both frames have grown in size, 1.1k in frame 1 and 4k in frame 2.
I've noticed that there are 132 new sprite entries and 159 new shape
entries, is this expected?
I've compared 4.5.2 with 4.6.0 and 4.6.0 and they are almost identical (4=
.6
produces even better results).

Jo=E3o Fernandes


On 9 July 2013 08:27, Jo=E3o Fernandes=20
<joaopedromartinsfernandes@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> On 9 July 2013 01:51, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Those shouldn't affect SWF size.  But any changes to classes that go i=
n
>> Frame 1 like SystemManager, or in generated code (like the CSS data)=20
>> could
>> make for larger SWFs.
>>
>>
> Alex, I don't think it's related to CSS since I see the increase in siz=
e
> just by switching SDKs and comparing generated file sizes, unless the
> compiler suffered changes, no? Do you think it will be easier to find t=
he
> culprint comparing report-size files?
>
> --
>
> Jo=E3o Fernandes
>


--=20

Jo=E3o Fernandes=20