flex-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From João Fernandes <joaopedromartinsfernan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: bigger swfs in 4.9.1
Date Tue, 09 Jul 2013 16:37:22 GMT
Ok done!

Thanks!


On 9 July 2013 17:28, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:

> João,
>
>
> The mail filters blocked it.  Try making the suffix of the link reports
> something like .xml or .txt and send again.   I think it doesn't like .lnk.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>
> On 7/9/13 9:25 AM, "João Fernandes" <joaopedromartinsfernandes@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Thanks Alex for your time, I've zipped and sent 2 zip files with those
> >report size files.
> >
> >Thank you once again for taking a look at it.
> >
> >João Fernandes
> >
> >
> >On 9 July 2013 17:04, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> João,
> >>
> >>
> >> Can you generate a link-report for 4.6 and 4.9.1 and email it to me
> >> directly?
> >>
> >> Are you using Spark DG in the app?  I did see additional assets added to
> >> the default DG styles to support drag/drop.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 7/9/13 8:57 AM, "João Fernandes"
> >><joaopedromartinsfernandes@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >What do you mean Tom? for testing purpose I've compiled the same app /
> >> >modules with both 4.5.2 / 4.6.0 / 4.9.1 and for each file there is a
> >>file
> >> >size increase with the exact same build mechanism, where isn't that "an
> >> >issue"? I agree (from the beginning) that it might not be a major issue
> >> >but
> >> >it's one nevertheless.
> >> >
> >> >What I've reported form the size-report is the difference from MXMLC
> >>for
> >> >each SDK Version so clearly, the compiler is adding stuff which wasn't
> >> >doing previously.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On 9 July 2013 16:21, Tom Chiverton <tc@extravision.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Given you don't even get the same file from two compiles of the same
> >> >>code
> >> >> at different times, I think 'issue' is stretching it ;-)
> >> >>
> >> >> Tom
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On 09/07/2013 15:18, João Fernandes wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> 4.5.2 was a prerelease version which we accepted it as good enough
> >>(no
> >> >>> signed RSLs) and never upgraded to 4.6.0. We're now upgrading to
> >>Apache
> >> >>> 4.9.1 and having this "small" issue.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 9 July 2013 15:08, David Hamiter
> >> >>><intoxopox@professorfripples.**com<intoxopox@professorfripples.com>>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>  Sorry to be a bit off topic, but I'm curious, João... where did
you
> >> >>>find
> >> >>>> Flex SDK 4.5.2? Was that a nightly build or something? The
only
> >> >>>>official
> >> >>>> 4.5 I can find is 4.5.1.21328A. If your copy of 4.5.2 appears
> >>stable,
> >> >>>>I
> >> >>>> would love to get a copy of it.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> David Hamiter
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: João Fernandes
> >> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 4:27 AM
> >> >>>> To: users@flex.apache.org
> >> >>>> Subject: Re: bigger swfs in 4.9.1
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Ok, I've compared size-report from 4.5.2 and 4.9.1 and I'm
noticing
> >> >>>>that
> >> >>>> both frames have grown in size, 1.1k in frame 1 and 4k in frame
2.
> >> >>>> I've noticed that there are 132 new sprite entries and 159
new
> >>shape
> >> >>>> entries, is this expected?
> >> >>>> I've compared 4.5.2 with 4.6.0 and 4.6.0 and they are almost
> >>identical
> >> >>>> (4.6
> >> >>>> produces even better results).
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> João Fernandes
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On 9 July 2013 08:27, João Fernandes <joaopedromartinsfernandes@**
> >> >>>> gmail.com
> >> >>>><joaopedromartinsfernandes@**gmail.com
> >> <joaopedromartinsfernandes@gmail.
> >> >>>>com>
> >> >>>> >>wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>  On 9 July 2013 01:51, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>  Those shouldn't affect SWF size.  But any changes to classes
that
> >> >>>>>go in
> >> >>>>>> Frame 1 like SystemManager, or in generated code (like
the CSS
> >>data)
> >> >>>>>> could
> >> >>>>>> make for larger SWFs.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>   Alex, I don't think it's related to CSS since I see
the
> >>increase
> >> >>>>>>in
> >> >>>>>> size
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> just by switching SDKs and comparing generated file sizes,
unless
> >>the
> >> >>>>> compiler suffered changes, no? Do you think it will be
easier to
> >>find
> >> >>>>> the
> >> >>>>> culprint comparing report-size files?
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> João Fernandes
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> João Fernandes
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >
> >> >João Fernandes
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >João Fernandes
>
>


-- 

João Fernandes

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message