Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3168EC47 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71631 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2013 15:08:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-users-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 71599 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2013 15:08:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 71591 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2013 15:08:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:08:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Mike_L_McConnell@lamd.uscourts.gov designates 199.107.16.140 as permitted sender) Received: from [199.107.16.140] (HELO mail1.uscourts.gov) (199.107.16.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:08:07 +0000 Received: from 05lammail01a.uscmail.dcn ([156.124.98.242]) by smtp1-m.asbn.gtwy.dcn with ESMTP; 28 Feb 2013 10:05:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <6166033698E12146A2CA04FDF01642F102A88CBC@lb-mob-dc-01.mob.lb.ccc> Subject: Re: Future of Flex technology X-KeepSent: 7EB9BFBB:DABDEFD6-86257B20:005304E9; type=4; name=$KeepSent To: users@flex.apache.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.3 September 15, 2011 Message-ID: From: Mike_L_McConnell@lamd.uscourts.gov Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:07:23 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on 05LAMMAIL01a/M/05/USCOURTS(Release 8.5.2FP4 HF60|March 21, 2012) at 02/28/2013 09:07:24 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Wow...Irrelevant? That's an absurd statement. I think you're just fla= me baiting.... MLM From: Alain Ekambi To: users@flex.apache.org, Date: 02/28/2013 09:05 AM Subject: Re: Future of Flex technology Now lets keep it real. Flex is irrelevant on mobile. 2013/2/28 Haissam Abdul Malak > Enterprise apps are great with Flex. > Mobile Apps specially almost one code based for all major platforms i= s > excellent. > That's why we love flex. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: stephen at stephenjc [mailto:stephen@stephenjc.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:40 PM > To: users@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: Future of Flex technology > > I cannot wrap my head around the js/dom model. That's why we use flex= for > our cross platform development. It just works. > On Feb 28, 2013 9:22 AM, "Oliver Wiemer" > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > we all love Flex. > > The best code language ever. > > All i can code in flex, i do that. > > And for enterprise application thats always the best. > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 28.02.13 15:15 schrieb "Scott Matheson" unter > > : > > > > >Hi > > > I am only a user of flex, I have spent 3 years of my time buildi= ng > > >a app for a charity, and we have 5-10 year life in the product, wh= at > > >I know, flex works, it is simple, it works, the good chaps on this= > > >list are investing a lot of there time to give flex a future, yes > > >HTML/CSS/JS is the elephant in the room, if / when we have quality= > > >cross-compiling we will look back and think adobe giving flex to > > >Apache was the best move ever > > > > > >We just need to give this project time > > > > > >Anyway that=B9s my 2cents > > > > > >Scott > > > > > > > > >On 2/28/13 8:52 AM, "Harbs" wrote: > > > > > >>Huh? > > >> > > >>You can compile MXML to AIR today. Who said anything about not > > >>supporting that? > > >> > > >>If you are talking about the Falcon Compiler (which is not requir= ed > > >>for compiling to AIR), the work for MXML compilation is currently= > > >>being finished by Gordon Smith. That's near-term support. The HTM= L > > >>/JS support is a longer term goal. I've never seen any indication= to > > >>cause your concerns. > > >> > > >>Harbs > > >> > > >>On Feb 28, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Terry Corbet wrote: > > >> > > >>> Why is it that you fail to see that each time you advertize you= r > > >>>rush to cross-compiling MXML to HTML/CSS/Javascript and never > > >>>provide status concerning the compilation of MXML to run in the = AIR > > >>>environment you are causing the very anxiety that we all deal wi= th? > > >>>You know that your employer is going to stop shipping the old > > >>>compiler in favor of the new compiler. You know that the Gaming > > >>>Guru will not let any resource be devoted to having the new > > >>>compiler successfully compile Flex, i.e. Spark Components. So, > > >>>exactly where are we supposed to feel confident that the Apache > > >>>Flex project will let us maintain 'parity' [your favoirite word]= in > > >>>regards to compiling our AIR MXML applications with the new > > >>>compiler? I have every reason to believe that you will achieve > > >>>your objective, which is to have the Falcon work let you > > >>>cross-compile to the environment that you believe has future > > >>>possibilities, and, as long as one person is on loan one day per= > > >>>week, to get MXML compilation working, not much reason whatsoeve= r to > believe that on-going developoment of AIR applictions has a future. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Harui" > > >>> To: ; > > >>> Sent: February 27, 2013 10:05 PM > > >>> Subject: Re: Future of Flex technology > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On 2/27/13 9:48 PM, "Devesh Mishra" > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>>> Is there any future of Flex technology, as we can see that the= re > > >>>>are no big improvements are coming in Flex. According to today= 's > > >>>>scenario, Flex is only for desktop application and we are > > >>>>entering into mobile technology. So it's a bit difficult to > > >>>>understand the future existence of Flex. > > >>>> > > >>>> If we talk from market point of view, everyone is moving towar= ds > > >>>>HTML5/Android/Ios, after Adobe declaration for no support in > > >>>>Flash/Flex. > > >>> Adobe did not say "no support". Adobe is still supporting Flas= h, > > >>>and you can still purchase Flex support contracts from Adobe. > > >>>Adobe donated Flex to Apache so it can continue to be developed= in > > >>>the open. Adobe continues to make releases of Flash. > > >>> > > >>> Still, lots of people are moving to HTML5/Android/IOS, and so i= s > > >>> Apache Flex. If you monitor the dev@flex.apache.org mailing li= st > > >>> you will > > see > > >>>that > > >>> we are hard at work on trying to cross-compile MXML and > > >>>ActionScript to HTML/JS/CSS which can then be run through > > >>>PhoneGap/Cordova to create mobile apps. It is still in its > > >>>infancy and we have lots of work ahead, but we are making > > >>>progress. > > >>> > > >>> See [1] for more on one approach we are taking. > > >>> > > >>> [1] > > >>> > > >>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Alex%27s+FlexJS+Pr= oto > > ty > > >>>p > > >>>e > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Alex Harui > > >>> Flex SDK Team > > >>> Adobe Systems, Inc. > > >>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> ----- > > >>> No virus found in this message. > > >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > >>> Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2641/6135 - Release Date= : > > >>>02/26/13 > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >________________________________ > > > > > >Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confident= ial > > >and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, plea= se > > >notify the sender immediately by replying to this email, and destr= oy > > >all copies of this email and any attachments. Thank you. > > > > > > > =