From issues-return-12474-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@flex.apache.org Wed Feb 13 00:08:47 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 482B3180675 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 01:08:47 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 2573 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2019 00:08:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 2564 invoked by uid 99); 13 Feb 2019 00:08:46 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:08:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E39F01818A5 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:08:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.3 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nQpO7Er08NFb for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:08:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id A3E61610F4 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 461DEE0104 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0E2DF24495 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:43:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alex Harui (JIRA)" To: issues@flex.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (FLEX-35398) Spark VideoDisplay error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35398?page=3Dcom.atlassian= .jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D1676= 6584#comment-16766584 ]=20 Alex Harui commented on FLEX-35398: ----------------------------------- Try swapping out the osmf.swc in Apache Flex with the one from Adobe Flex 4= .6. =C2=A0No guarantees though. > Spark VideoDisplay error > ------------------------ > > Key: FLEX-35398 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35398 > Project: Apache Flex > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Spark: VideoPlayer > Affects Versions: Apache Flex 4.16.1 > Reporter: SteveJC > Priority: Major > > App I'm maintaining was originally develop using Adobe Flex 4.6. I have t= ried compiling it under Apache Flex 4.16.1 and AIR SDK 32. > Btw I encountered problem with the ant installer but got past it by remov= ing references to the errant "air-check" task. After that, AIR SDK download= s the correct version fine. > On to the main problem: > I'm using VideoDisplay (spark) somewhere in my code and it was throwing t= his error: > {code:java} > RangeError: Error #2004: One of the parameters is invalid. > at flash.media::StageVideo/set viewPort() > at org.osmf.media.videoClasses::VideoSurface/updateView() > at org.osmf.media.videoClasses::VideoSurface/set x() > at org.osmf.layout::LayoutRendererBase/layout() > at org.osmf.layout::LayoutRendererBase/validateNow() > at org.osmf.containers::MediaContainer/validateNow() > at spark.components::VideoDisplay/updateDisplayList()[D:\flex_sdk\Source= s\flex-sdk\frameworks\projects\spark\src\spark\components\VideoDisplay.as:1= 390] > at mx.core::UIComponent/validateDisplayList()[D:\flex_sdk\Sources\flex-s= dk\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\core\UIComponent.as:9531] > at mx.managers::LayoutManager/validateDisplayList()[D:\flex_sdk\Sources\= flex-sdk\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\managers\LayoutManager.as:740= ] > at mx.managers::LayoutManager/doPhasedInstantiation()[D:\flex_sdk\Source= s\flex-sdk\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\managers\LayoutManager.as:8= 23] > at mx.managers::LayoutManager/doPhasedInstantiationCallback()[D:\flex_sd= k\Sources\flex-sdk\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\managers\LayoutMana= ger.as:1191]{code} > There seems to be a bug in the=C2=A0OSMF code(?). > The workaround I did was to simply switch back to mx:VideoDisplay and los= e some features. Also noticed video quality is not as good. > Is there any other way I can retain spark VideoDisplay? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)