flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork
Date Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:09:06 GMT
Hi -

We have one alternative name - Royale

Are there others that people would like to propose?

If not then we can have a simple VOTE between FlexJS and Royale.

Regards,
Dave

> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Om,
> 
> I think that dilutes the votes and biases the result towards FlexJS. If we want to go
that way then we need a preference ranking and more complicated VOTE counting.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> We could always structure the VOTE like this:
>> 
>> 1.  Royale
>> 2.  XXX
>> 3.  YYY
>> 4.  FlexJS
>> 
>> One vote should answer both questions.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not change the
>>> name and Alex is right. - I'm seeing more people asking for help with
>>> porting. - We may disappear in the sea of frameworks with changed name...
>>> 
>>> Maybe better have solid framework and invest in current name still with
>>> nice branding. I'm puzzled, so definitely I will give myself at least one
>>> day more before VOTE.
>>> 
>>> Piotr
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2017-09-13 23:31 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>>> +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change.
>>>> 
>>>> I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to build new
>>>> brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can always
>>> state
>>>> from where we have come and what was our story.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" as the
>>>> most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use it since
>>>> it was code name of Macromedia Framework ?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Piotr
>>>> 
>>>> 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net>:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi -
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Carlos’ argument carries weight to me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, that’s
>>>>> value I can recognize.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be involved
>>>>> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around the name.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do
>>> about
>>>>> mine.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t want
to
>>>>> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new name
can
>>> we
>>>>> try and pick one quickly?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the result then
>>>>> we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Dave
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira <
>>>>> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really important
>>>>> for
>>>>>>> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is
>>>>> important in
>>>>>>> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we
don't
>>>>> get a
>>>>>>> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where
we
>>>>> explain
>>>>>>> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our
time,
>>>>> since
>>>>>>> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS projects,
and
>>>>>>> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other
>>> than
>>>>> JS!!
>>>>>>> (If we want in future years to make it possible).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name
for
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>> 
>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557>
>>>> skype: zarzycki10
>>>> 
>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>> 
>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
>>> skype: zarzycki10
>>> 
>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
>>> 
> 


Mime
View raw message