flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)
Date Tue, 19 Sep 2017 20:11:56 GMT
Piotr changed his vote.

It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.

Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.

Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they aren't
concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.

-Alex

On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:

>Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
>
>That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
>
>Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
>>Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs
>>12.
>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
>>site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
>>
>>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
>>mentioned
>>5 times, Beads 4 times.
>>
>>-Alex
>>
>>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>>>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.  I
>>>changed it again.
>>>
>>>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
>>>move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
>>>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>>>
>>>-Alex
>>>
>>>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>>>>
>>>>EdB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <erik@ixsoftware.nl>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>>>>>before
>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>>>>>
>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
>>>>>break
>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>>>>>right?)
>>>>>
>>>>> EdB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
>>>>><aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> What a dilemma!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
>>>>>>wanted
>>>>>>to
>>>>>> see what the trend was first.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
>>>>>>Royale
>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
>>>>>>10.
>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3
of
>>>>>>those
>>>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
>>>>>>times,
>>>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>>>>>>Limber
>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend
on
>>>>>>how
>>>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
>>>>>>given
>>>>>>the
>>>>>> other vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
>>>>>>low-quality
>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>>>>>>hindrance?
>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>>>>>>already
>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
>>>>>>show
>>>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
>>>>>> opinion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name
is
>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
>>>>>>this
>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>>>>>>redirect
>>>>>> issue is worrisome.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] 
>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith
>>>>>>u
>>>>>>b
>>>>>>.
>>>>>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d
>>>>>>4
>>>>>>f
>>>>>>f
>>>>>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63641437321198628
>>>>>>8
>>>>>>&
>>>>>>s
>>>>>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>>>>>> Muppirala"
>>>>>> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Abstain (binding)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2wave@comcast.net>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> I am abstaining for now.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>> >><piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Hi,
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition
for fork
>>>>>>of
>>>>>> >>FlexJS
>>>>>> >> > project.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > LIST:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Royale
>>>>>> >> > Boja
>>>>>> >> > Strand
>>>>>> >> > Bead
>>>>>> >> > Limber
>>>>>> >> > Boinga
>>>>>> >> > Braid
>>>>>> >> > Arise
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
>>>>>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from
the most
>>>>>> favorite
>>>>>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which
you
>>>>>>have
>>>>>> >>choose
>>>>>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others
can
>>>>>>follow
>>>>>>it
>>>>>> >>in
>>>>>> >> > their lists
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > EXAMPLE:
>>>>>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
>>>>>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
>>>>>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > WINNER:
>>>>>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one
of the
>>>>>>name.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00
UTC
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Thanks,
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Piotr
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>>
>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
>>>>> I. 
>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&d
>>>>>a
>>>>>t
>>>>>a
>>>>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed
>>>>>2
>>>>>c
>>>>>1
>>>>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%
>>>>>2
>>>>>B
>>>>>U
>>>>>tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-- 
>>>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>
>>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>
>>>>T. 06-51952295
>>>>I. 
>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&da
>>>>t
>>>>a
>>>>=
>>>>02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
>>>>1
>>>>7
>>>>8
>>>>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2BU
>>>>t
>>>>f
>>>>l
>>>>EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message