flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)
Date Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:21:40 GMT
Dave changed his abstention to a vote.

That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.

Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.

-Alex

On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:

>Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs 12.
> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
>site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
>
>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been mentioned
>5 times, Beads 4 times.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
>>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.  I
>>changed it again.
>>
>>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
>>move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
>>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>>
>>-Alex
>>
>>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>
>>>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>>>
>>>EdB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <erik@ixsoftware.nl>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>>>>before
>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>>>>
>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
>>>>break
>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>>>>right?)
>>>>
>>>> EdB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What a dilemma!
>>>>>
>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I wanted
>>>>>to
>>>>> see what the trend was first.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
>>>>>Royale
>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
>>>>>10.
>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of
>>>>>those
>>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
>>>>>times,
>>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>>>>>Limber
>>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
>>>>>
>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
>>>>>how
>>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
>>>>>given
>>>>>the
>>>>> other vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
>>>>>low-quality
>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>>>>>hindrance?
>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>>>>>already
>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a show
>>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
>>>>> opinion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is
>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
>>>>>this
>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>>>>>redirect
>>>>> issue is worrisome.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] 
>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithu
>>>>>b
>>>>>.
>>>>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4
>>>>>f
>>>>>f
>>>>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288
>>>>>&
>>>>>s
>>>>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>>>>> Muppirala"
>>>>> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >Abstain (binding)
>>>>> >
>>>>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2wave@comcast.net>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> I am abstaining for now.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>> >><piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Hi,
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition
for fork
>>>>>of
>>>>> >>FlexJS
>>>>> >> > project.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > LIST:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Royale
>>>>> >> > Boja
>>>>> >> > Strand
>>>>> >> > Bead
>>>>> >> > Limber
>>>>> >> > Boinga
>>>>> >> > Braid
>>>>> >> > Arise
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
>>>>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the
most
>>>>> favorite
>>>>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which
you have
>>>>> >>choose
>>>>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others
can
>>>>>follow
>>>>>it
>>>>> >>in
>>>>> >> > their lists
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > EXAMPLE:
>>>>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
>>>>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
>>>>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > WINNER:
>>>>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of
the
>>>>>name.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00
UTC
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Thanks,
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Piotr
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>
>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>
>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
>>>> I. 
>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&da
>>>>t
>>>>a
>>>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2
>>>>c
>>>>1
>>>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2
>>>>B
>>>>U
>>>>tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>>
>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>>
>>>T. 06-51952295
>>>I. 
>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&dat
>>>a
>>>=
>>>02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
>>>7
>>>8
>>>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2BUt
>>>f
>>>l
>>>EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>>
>

Mime
View raw message