flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork
Date Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:51:02 GMT
I think the momentum is shifting and the vote will be about some other
name.

-Alex

On 9/13/17, 2:46 PM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2wave@comcast.net> wrote:

>When we start the VOTE I suggest the following ballot:
>
>VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
>
>[ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
>[ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
>discussed.
>[ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called.
>
>Discuss?
>
>Regards,
>Dave
>
>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> 
>> +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change.
>> 
>> I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to build new
>> brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can always
>>state
>> from where we have come and what was our story.
>> 
>> I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" as the
>> most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use it
>>since
>> it was code name of Macromedia Framework ?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>> 
>> 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net>:
>> 
>>> Hi -
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Carlos’ argument carries weight to me.
>>>> 
>>>> If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, that’s
>>> value I can recognize.
>>>> 
>>>> The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be involved
>>> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around the name.
>>>> 
>>>> Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do
>>>>about
>>> mine.
>>>> 
>>>> A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t want to
>>> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new name can
>>>we
>>> try and pick one quickly?
>>> 
>>> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning.
>>> 
>>> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the result
>>>then we
>>> can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Harbs
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira <
>>> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really important
>>>>>for
>>>>> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is
>>>>>important
>>> in
>>>>> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we don't
>>>>>get
>>> a
>>>>> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where we
>>> explain
>>>>> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our time,
>>> since
>>>>> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS projects, and
>>>>> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other
>>>>>than
>>> JS!!
>>>>> (If we want in future years to make it possible).
>>>>> 
>>>>> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name for
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>> 
>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
>> skype: zarzycki10
>> 
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
>

Mime
View raw message