flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)
Date Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:35:15 GMT
Carlos,

If you will need any help and my time allows let me know. :)

Piotr

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017, 09:29 Carlos Rovira <carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Piotr, just see the results and very happy to see that Royale was
> the most voted. Now is time to work the brand to make us shine.
>
> :)
>
> Carlos
>
> 2017-09-20 9:00 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com>:
>
> > Thanks Piotr.
> >
> > Looks like we’re now Royale. :-)
> >
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>:
> > >
> > >> Justin voted.
> > >>
> > >> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
> > >> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.
> > >>
> > >> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
> > >> Limber on 6 out of 12.
> > >>
> > >> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads
> > have
> > >> 2.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> -Alex
> > >>
> > >> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Piotr changed his vote.
> > >>>
> > >>> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at
> 13.
> > >>> Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
> > >>>
> > >>> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> > >>>
> > >>> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they
> > aren't
> > >>> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
> > >>> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
> > >>>
> > >>> -Alex
> > >>>
> > >>> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID>
wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> > >>>> Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -Alex
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale,
13
> > vs
> > >>>>> 12.
> > >>>>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being
an
> adult
> > >>>>> site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have
been
> > >>>>> mentioned
> > >>>>> 5 times, Beads 4 times.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -Alex
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough
for
> > Gmail.
> > >>>>>> I
> > >>>>>> changed it again.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your
vote
> alone
> > can
> > >>>>>> move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually
> increase
> > the
> > >>>>>> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -Alex
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread
:-(
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> EdB
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <
> erik@ixsoftware.nl
> > >
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection
with
> went
> > >>>>>>>> before
> > >>>>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend
very much. If I
> > can
> > >>>>>>>> break
> > >>>>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before
the VOTE
> closes,
> > >>>>>>>> right?)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> EdB
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
> > >>>>>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> What a dilemma!
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't
voted yet.  I
> > >>>>>>>>> wanted
> > >>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>> see what the trend was first.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to
second, and 1 to
> > third,
> > >>>>>>>>> Royale
> > >>>>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead,
Boja and Limber
> > have
> > >>>>>>>>> 10.
> > >>>>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other
name (6 times),
> but 3
> > >>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>> those
> > >>>>>>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have
been mentioned 5
> > >>>>>>>>> times,
> > >>>>>>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place
votes (3).
> > Royale,
> > >>>>>>>>> Limber
> > >>>>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.
 It will
> depend
> > on
> > >>>>>>>>> how
> > >>>>>>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default
back to FlexJS
> either
> > >>>>>>>>> given
> > >>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>> other vote.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is
associated with
> > >>>>>>>>> low-quality
> > >>>>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale
will be a major
> > >>>>>>>>> hindrance?
> > >>>>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other
Github project
> is
> > >>>>>>>>> already
> > >>>>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does
anybody see that as
> a
> > >>>>>>>>> show
> > >>>>>>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@
and try to get
> > their
> > >>>>>>>>> opinion.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless
of which
> name
> > >>>>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or
Limber?  After
> > reading
> > >>>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.
 The spell
> checker
> > >>>>>>>>> redirect
> > >>>>>>>>> issue is worrisome.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
> > >>>>>>>>> -Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > >> https%3A%2F%2Fgit
> > >>>>>>>>> h
> > >>>>>>>>> u
> > >>>>>>>>> b
> > >>>>>>>>> .
> > >>>>>>>>> com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%
> > >> 7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08
> > >>>>>>>>> d
> > >>>>>>>>> 4
> > >>>>>>>>> f
> > >>>>>>>>> f
> > >>>>>>>>> 8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > >> 7C6364143732119862
> > >>>>>>>>> 8
> > >>>>>>>>> 8
> > >>>>>>>>> &
> > >>>>>>>>> s
> > >>>>>>>>>
> data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on
behalf of
> OmPrakash
> > >>>>>>>>> Muppirala"
> > >>>>>>>>> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Abstain (binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher"
<
> dave2wave@comcast.net>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I am abstaining for now.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr
Zarzycki
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> In this thread I've gathered list
of names proposition for
> > >>>>>>>>> fork
> > >>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>> FlexJS
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> project.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> LIST:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Royale
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Boja
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Strand
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Bead
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Limber
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Boinga
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Braid
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Arise
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> HOW DO WE VOTE:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Pick up 3 names from the list
and order them from the
> most
> > >>>>>>>>> favorite
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) We will give points for each
items in the list which you
> > >>>>>>>>> have
> > >>>>>>>>>>> choose
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) In your list you can propose
your own name - others can
> > >>>>>>>>> follow
> > >>>>>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> their lists
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> EXAMPLE:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Name1 - 3 points
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Name2 - 2 points
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Name3 - 1 point
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> WINNER:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> We will pickup winner based on
gathered points by one of the
> > >>>>>>>>> name.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open until Tuesday
September 19, 23:00 UTC
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> > >>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
> > >>>>>>>> I.
> > >>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > >> www.ixsoftware.nl&
> > >>>>>>>> d
> > >>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>> t
> > >>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>> =02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
> > >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
> > >>>>>>>> d
> > >>>>>>>> 2
> > >>>>>>>> c
> > >>>>>>>> 1
> > >>>>>>>> 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
> > >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu
> > >>>>>>>> %
> > >>>>>>>> 2
> > >>>>>>>> B
> > >>>>>>>> U
> > >>>>>>>> tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> > >>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> T. 06-51952295
> > >>>>>>> I.
> > >>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > >> www.ixsoftware.nl&d
> > >>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>> t
> > >>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>> =
> > >>>>>>> 02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
> > >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2
> > >>>>>>> c
> > >>>>>>> 1
> > >>>>>>> 7
> > >>>>>>> 8
> > >>>>>>> decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
> > >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B
> > >>>>>>> U
> > >>>>>>> t
> > >>>>>>> f
> > >>>>>>> l
> > >>>>>>> EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > mobile: +48 880 859 557
> > > skype: zarzycki10
> > >
> > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> <http://www.codeoscopic.com>
>
> Carlos Rovira
>
> Director General
>
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
>
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>
> http://www.avant2.es
>
>
> Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU>
>
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> necesaria.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message