flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)
Date Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:29:25 GMT
Thanks Piotr, just see the results and very happy to see that Royale was
the most voted. Now is time to work the brand to make us shine.

:)

Carlos

2017-09-20 9:00 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com>:

> Thanks Piotr.
>
> Looks like we’re now Royale. :-)
>
> Harbs
>
> > On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> >> Justin voted.
> >>
> >> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
> >> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.
> >>
> >> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
> >> Limber on 6 out of 12.
> >>
> >> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads
> have
> >> 2.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Piotr changed his vote.
> >>>
> >>> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
> >>> Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
> >>>
> >>> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> >>>
> >>> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they
> aren't
> >>> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
> >>> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
> >>>>
> >>>> That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
> >>>>
> >>>> Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> >>>> Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID>
wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale,
13
> vs
> >>>>> 12.
> >>>>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
> >>>>> site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
> >>>>> mentioned
> >>>>> 5 times, Beads 4 times.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID>
wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for
> Gmail.
> >>>>>> I
> >>>>>> changed it again.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote
alone
> can
> >>>>>> move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase
> the
> >>>>>> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl>
wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> EdB
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <erik@ixsoftware.nl
> >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection
with went
> >>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very
much. If I
> can
> >>>>>>>> break
> >>>>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the
VOTE closes,
> >>>>>>>> right?)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> EdB
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
> >>>>>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> What a dilemma!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't
voted yet.  I
> >>>>>>>>> wanted
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>> see what the trend was first.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second,
and 1 to
> third,
> >>>>>>>>> Royale
> >>>>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja
and Limber
> have
> >>>>>>>>> 10.
> >>>>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name
(6 times), but 3
> >>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>> those
> >>>>>>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been
mentioned 5
> >>>>>>>>> times,
> >>>>>>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes
(3).
> Royale,
> >>>>>>>>> Limber
> >>>>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.
 It will depend
> on
> >>>>>>>>> how
> >>>>>>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back
to FlexJS either
> >>>>>>>>> given
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> other vote.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated
with
> >>>>>>>>> low-quality
> >>>>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will
be a major
> >>>>>>>>> hindrance?
> >>>>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other
Github project is
> >>>>>>>>> already
> >>>>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody
see that as a
> >>>>>>>>> show
> >>>>>>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and
try to get
> their
> >>>>>>>>> opinion.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless
of which name
> >>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?
 After
> reading
> >>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The
spell checker
> >>>>>>>>> redirect
> >>>>>>>>> issue is worrisome.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fgit
> >>>>>>>>> h
> >>>>>>>>> u
> >>>>>>>>> b
> >>>>>>>>> .
> >>>>>>>>> com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%
> >> 7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08
> >>>>>>>>> d
> >>>>>>>>> 4
> >>>>>>>>> f
> >>>>>>>>> f
> >>>>>>>>> 8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C6364143732119862
> >>>>>>>>> 8
> >>>>>>>>> 8
> >>>>>>>>> &
> >>>>>>>>> s
> >>>>>>>>> data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf
of OmPrakash
> >>>>>>>>> Muppirala"
> >>>>>>>>> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Abstain (binding)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2wave@comcast.net>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I am abstaining for now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>>>>>>>>> <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In this thread I've gathered list of
names proposition for
> >>>>>>>>> fork
> >>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>> FlexJS
> >>>>>>>>>>>> project.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> LIST:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Royale
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Boja
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Strand
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bead
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Limber
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Boinga
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Braid
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Arise
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> HOW DO WE VOTE:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and
order them from the most
> >>>>>>>>> favorite
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) We will give points for each items
in the list which you
> >>>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>>> choose
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) In your list you can propose your
own name - others can
> >>>>>>>>> follow
> >>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> their lists
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> EXAMPLE:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Name1 - 3 points
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Name2 - 2 points
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Name3 - 1 point
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> WINNER:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> We will pickup winner based on gathered
points by one of the
> >>>>>>>>> name.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open until Tuesday
September 19, 23:00 UTC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
> >>>>>>>> I.
> >>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> www.ixsoftware.nl&
> >>>>>>>> d
> >>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>> t
> >>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>> =02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
> >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
> >>>>>>>> d
> >>>>>>>> 2
> >>>>>>>> c
> >>>>>>>> 1
> >>>>>>>> 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
> >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu
> >>>>>>>> %
> >>>>>>>> 2
> >>>>>>>> B
> >>>>>>>> U
> >>>>>>>> tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> T. 06-51952295
> >>>>>>> I.
> >>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> www.ixsoftware.nl&d
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>> t
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>> =
> >>>>>>> 02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
> >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2
> >>>>>>> c
> >>>>>>> 1
> >>>>>>> 7
> >>>>>>> 8
> >>>>>>> decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
> >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B
> >>>>>>> U
> >>>>>>> t
> >>>>>>> f
> >>>>>>> l
> >>>>>>> EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > mobile: +48 880 859 557
> > skype: zarzycki10
> >
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
>
>


-- 

<http://www.codeoscopic.com>

Carlos Rovira

Director General

M: +34 607 22 60 05

http://www.codeoscopic.com

http://www.avant2.es


Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU>


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.

De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message