flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?
Date Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:01:10 GMT
Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(

EdB



On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:

> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went before
> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>
> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can break
> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes, right?)
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> What a dilemma!
>>
>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I wanted to
>> see what the trend was first.
>>
>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third, Royale
>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have 10.
>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of those
>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5 times,
>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale, Limber
>> have 2 first place votes each.
>>
>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on how
>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either given the
>> other vote.
>>
>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with low-quality
>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major hindrance?
>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is already
>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a show
>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
>> opinion.
>>
>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is
>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>>
>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading this
>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker redirect
>> issue is worrisome.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/ian-culleton/royale
>>
>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>> Muppirala"
>> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Abstain (binding)
>> >
>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2wave@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am abstaining for now.
>> >>
>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>> >><piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of
>> >>FlexJS
>> >> > project.
>> >> >
>> >> > LIST:
>> >> >
>> >> > Royale
>> >> > Boja
>> >> > Strand
>> >> > Bead
>> >> > Limber
>> >> > Boinga
>> >> > Braid
>> >> > Arise
>> >> >
>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
>> favorite
>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have
>> >>choose
>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow it
>> >>in
>> >> > their lists
>> >> >
>> >> > EXAMPLE:
>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
>> >> >
>> >> > WINNER:
>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.
>> >> >
>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > Piotr
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>



-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message