flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 RC1
Date Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:49:39 GMT
Hi -

> On Jun 12, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> 
> I'm confused.  Can I get a summary?
> 
> Are there some files that are being caught by RAT?  If so, what are they?
> 
> Are we sure the process should be that the RM should switch away from
> SNAPSHOT before the vote?  If a major problem is found in that RC,
> wouldn't we have deployed bad artifacts under the final version number and
> have to pull them back?  Or abandon that release version and use the next
> version number?

The Tomcat project will user version numbers. If a version fails then they advance to the
next. They still produce changelings for the version that is not released. You can see the
gory details for version 7 here: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/changelog.html

Regards,
Dave

> 
> IMO, the main thing folks want from Maven are the JARs which aren't an
> official ASF release anyway.  Seems like we should vote on a source
> package, then set any version numbers and have Maven build the final jars
> from there.  The differences in the source should only be in POMs and
> other configs right?
> 
> What am I missing?
> -Alex
> 
> On 6/12/17, 3:53 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:
> 
>> It should be between the Last call and opening the vote. It is equal to
>> “cutting the release candidate”.
>> 
>> So, the LAST CALL thread is finished and the RM writes that he’s going to
>> cut a release … AFTER THAT he does these steps and THEN he opens the vote
>> thread. I never said anything else than that.
>> 
>> Chris
>> 
>> 
>> Am 12.06.17, 12:30 schrieb "piotrz" <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>:
>> 
>>   Chris,
>> 
>>   I'm a bit confused. You have said that I shouldn't do this as part of
>>   VOTING, LAST CALL:
>> 
>>   "No,
>> 
>>   The removing the SNAPSHOT, tagging and setting the new version should
>> be,
>>   more or less, one step.
>>   "
>> 
>>   Now you are saying just opposite. So again when I should do this
>> (Last Call,
>>   Voting) step ?
>> 
>>   "1) In order to have a proper Maven release, the versions of the
>> maven build
>>   should be changed to “0.8.0” (omit the SNAPSHOT). "
>> 
>>   Piotr
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   -----
>>   Apache Flex PMC
>>   piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>>   --
>>   View this message in context:
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle
>> x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FDISCUSS-Discuss-Release-Apache-FlexJ
>> S-0-8-0-RC1-tp62274p62341.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C764b156340ed4161762808d4b
>> 1813b7a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636328616008847001&sd
>> ata=pnXSK31V8HvCRI9NlEVlGD0SgCczOCQYlw0PyoVZnfQ%3D&reserved=0
>>   Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>> 
>> 
> 


Mime
View raw message