flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 RC1
Date Tue, 13 Jun 2017 07:15:21 GMT
All Flex project repos are prefixed with flex-

> On Jun 13, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:
> 
> By the way … why is this directory called “flex-typedefs” and not “flexjs-typedefs”?
> 
> Chris
> 
> Am 13.06.17, 08:55 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>:
> 
>    Hi all,
> 
>    Please don’t let this become another license discussion … I thought that had been
settled. I intentionally added that this was a technical issue in my report. 
>    If the flexjs-typedefs directory is going to be included in the compiler package,
the compiler packages pom needs an exclusion for the flexjs-typedefs directory to avoid any
problems like this. The content of the flesjs-typedefs directory will be checked by the flexjs-typedefs
build so in the end all is checked. I’m just going to do this little tweak myself so if
a new release candidate is created, we have this “fix” in place.
> 
>    Chris 
> 
>    Am 13.06.17, 00:49 schrieb "Dave Fisher" <dave2wave@comcast.net>:
> 
>        Hi -
> 
>> On Jun 12, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>> 
>> I'm confused.  Can I get a summary?
>> 
>> Are there some files that are being caught by RAT?  If so, what are they?
>> 
>> Are we sure the process should be that the RM should switch away from
>> SNAPSHOT before the vote?  If a major problem is found in that RC,
>> wouldn't we have deployed bad artifacts under the final version number and
>> have to pull them back?  Or abandon that release version and use the next
>> version number?
> 
>        The Tomcat project will user version numbers. If a version fails then they advance
to the next. They still produce changelings for the version that is not released. You can
see the gory details for version 7 here: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/changelog.html
> 
>        Regards,
>        Dave
> 
>> 
>> IMO, the main thing folks want from Maven are the JARs which aren't an
>> official ASF release anyway.  Seems like we should vote on a source
>> package, then set any version numbers and have Maven build the final jars
>> from there.  The differences in the source should only be in POMs and
>> other configs right?
>> 
>> What am I missing?
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 6/12/17, 3:53 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> It should be between the Last call and opening the vote. It is equal to
>>> “cutting the release candidate”.
>>> 
>>> So, the LAST CALL thread is finished and the RM writes that he’s going to
>>> cut a release … AFTER THAT he does these steps and THEN he opens the vote
>>> thread. I never said anything else than that.
>>> 
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Am 12.06.17, 12:30 schrieb "piotrz" <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>>  Chris,
>>> 
>>>  I'm a bit confused. You have said that I shouldn't do this as part of
>>>  VOTING, LAST CALL:
>>> 
>>>  "No,
>>> 
>>>  The removing the SNAPSHOT, tagging and setting the new version should
>>> be,
>>>  more or less, one step.
>>>  "
>>> 
>>>  Now you are saying just opposite. So again when I should do this
>>> (Last Call,
>>>  Voting) step ?
>>> 
>>>  "1) In order to have a proper Maven release, the versions of the
>>> maven build
>>>  should be changed to “0.8.0” (omit the SNAPSHOT). "
>>> 
>>>  Piotr
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  -----
>>>  Apache Flex PMC
>>>  piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>>>  --
>>>  View this message in context:
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle
>>> x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FDISCUSS-Discuss-Release-Apache-FlexJ
>>> S-0-8-0-RC1-tp62274p62341.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C764b156340ed4161762808d4b
>>> 1813b7a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636328616008847001&sd
>>> ata=pnXSK31V8HvCRI9NlEVlGD0SgCczOCQYlw0PyoVZnfQ%3D&reserved=0
>>>  Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
>>> Nabble.com.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message