Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
From: Peter Ent <pent@adobe.com>
To: "dev@flex.apache.org" <dev@flex.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Container and Layout Progress
Thread-Topic: [FlexJS] Container and Layout Progress
Thread-Index: AQHSooz0du3c9jRNT0yn0CQo1xz/zKGf2BiAgACU6gCAAIGlgIAABR2AgAAjOwCAANjcp4AAvAKAgAACNYCAAANpgP//xTgA
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:01:02 +0000
Message-ID: <D4F984F6.220F4%pent@adobe.com>
References: <D4F7180C.21FC8%pent@adobe.com>
 <1490133649788-60659.post@n4.nabble.com> <D4F7CF98.2201B%pent@adobe.com>
 <1490193469336-60673.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <CFCC7F78-25E8-4E42-A158-056D39029FC7@gmail.com>
 <D4F85D21.22077%pent@adobe.com>
 <dfyu9g14vfgguylyhn8ergn1.1490248695565@email.android.com>
 <2E864388-F504-4B2E-BEB3-E3FD999F2231@gmail.com>
 <CADZSWG4ENLP6CjwfbDFfkbc8pF5kmpaAcoNjcz2tfZ5HyrX-xg@mail.gmail.com>
 <3227F3EE-E509-4600-ACF5-E959D8D5F22A@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3227F3EE-E509-4600-ACF5-E959D8D5F22A@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.2.170228
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [24.98.132.247]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;BN6PR02MB2804;7:yjI/QDpA83F5FUlLlE9z8NdNA3sCCWLVC/WLWa0f2Jhh0G1rCP7ik4as3Gwhi09qACCS538vIDeXOl2sL+Y1EZzwFle125l6HE00OYo3dbi6z6rCHcadf1s+RH0sMTWmPiyYcR8aIeLUOB31uIEUH5SHds6FXm73Kd8FovsxM1fQj/c5Z/mlQCo4TcELHQgv0uAsOPrw48PQcwivmX2nHrBDyBEU3didYMOT8rv6m66+EqqcRKKyzpWEEORMb8qLxODMBcBzISr+7brXfHZZXkqYZZxpZFbR2Gl8LQD3syjcwr07IaywYb+gZ5rLJzMlZtiMeeYB1A/M75q+iKQM0w==;20:xk1OTPxHjQGVdt1teXLb4HDA9FXNOcHVdK7z7JhBgumy6fVJRrp8Pn3GrXqDXczHAT+t8LqVNvpl0mTVLdD5md7XqHvHFIJHeb5FAcFmj7eeABoE4wZJ53gKdIDnF4nFgpJeTQXzjdlOXZvl+bOZy83saeAuOocLeA82ExJp5uw=
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ade140f5-1d70-4277-f750-08d4721691ae
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081);SRVR:BN6PR02MB2804;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR02MB280485643F69C4D3D9FE52E5D73F0@BN6PR02MB2804.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(61425038)(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6041248)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(20161123562025)(20161123558025)(20161123564025)(6072148);SRVR:BN6PR02MB2804;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN6PR02MB2804;
x-forefront-prvs: 0255DF69B9
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39850400002)(39410400002)(39450400003)(39860400002)(39840400002)(377454003)(24454002)(6436002)(5640700003)(53936002)(77096006)(102836003)(8676002)(53546009)(305945005)(2351001)(10090500001)(93886004)(2906002)(6506006)(6116002)(2950100002)(25786009)(86362001)(3846002)(6486002)(83506001)(8936002)(6916009)(36756003)(2501003)(229853002)(1730700003)(81166006)(3280700002)(50986999)(54356999)(66066001)(6246003)(76176999)(189998001)(110136004)(3660700001)(122556002)(5660300001)(38730400002)(7736002)(99286003)(6512007)(2900100001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:BN6PR02MB2804;H:BN6PR02MB2804.namprd02.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <B24F67C5654E454CAA0C3DCBE8876B65@namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: adobe.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Mar 2017 18:01:02.4201
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: fa7b1b5a-7b34-4387-94ae-d2c178decee1
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR02MB2804
archived-at: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:01:31 -0000

Yes, Chris does have a good point and from now on* I will definitely use
feature branches. I thought I could squeeze this through.

I checked in changes to Chart that should make it compile. I doubt it will
run, but that is on the list. I will look into MDL now. That will take
longer.

I am leary about doing the rollback at this point. You should be able to
remove MDL from the build temporarily. If you are relying on it, I will
try to be as quick as possible and test against the MDL example before
pushing my changes.

* I will use feature branches once I get MDL working.

Apologies,
=8Bpeter

On 3/23/17, 1:31 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

>Sure. Including me.
>
>But Chris does have a point that we should be using feature branches more
>than we are.
>
>The tone of my question might have not come across correctly. I meant to
>ask how difficult it would be to move all changes to a feature branch and
>push the feature branch. If it=B9s too difficult, we can just continue to
>fix the develop branch for now.
>
>> On Mar 23, 2017, at 7:19 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynjala@gmail.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> Peter warned the list that his changes would break some things
>>temporarily,
>> and he asked if he should proceed. Everyone who responded said that it
>>was
>> okay.
>>=20
>> - Josh
>>=20
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>> Very good question.
>>>=20
>>> Peter, is there any chance to roll back containers and layouts and move
>>> all the changes to a feature branch until things are stable?
>>>=20
>>>> On Mar 23, 2017, at 7:58 AM, Christofer Dutz
>>>><christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>> Why don't you guys use feature branches?
>>>=20
>>>=20
>