Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id E789C200C2B for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 10:47:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E632A160B61; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C586160B6F for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 10:47:50 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 87695 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2017 09:47:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 87684 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2017 09:47:49 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 09:47:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A27EC189511 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:47:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.487 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.487 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GDc97rv6jz-4 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id BB82F5FDEA for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mjoe.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.57]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C3A30339F3D for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 02:47:36 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 01:42:07 -0800 (PST) From: sankar To: dev@flex.apache.org Message-ID: <1488447727233-59978.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <86F29FC6-48A8-4EB4-9126-FCC0172E87AD@gmail.com> References: <10C408CC-5B96-483E-8B4E-C4DC1AAA9BC6@gmail.com> <91892BC5-6F5C-4A40-AE34-6ED6FC96A15D@gmail.com> <86F29FC6-48A8-4EB4-9126-FCC0172E87AD@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [MDL Dialogs] was: Re: [FlexJS] MDL - Dynamic Child Problem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 09:47:51 -0000 Hi, I recently updated my local framework source from Git repository. I am not sure where we're standing now with this but I wanted to give Piotr's Button and TextField implementation a try with new UpgradeElement bead. So far I able to get the dynamic element upgraded by this way: var newButton:Button = new Button(true); Piotr, I have a question: - I didn't seen any "isDynamic" property in MXML declaration as I know the property was only limited to constructor. Are you planning to do something on this? Also, if I have a component filled with many elements, i.e. buttons, textfields etc. and want to add that component at runtime, I shall basically needs to set "isDynamic=true" to every components in it, is that right? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-MDL-Dynamic-Child-Problem-tp59595p59978.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.