flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [FlexJS][Maven] JS-only
Date Sun, 05 Mar 2017 07:34:40 GMT
Ok, looks like I removed the typedefs mojo "temporarily" and never
replaced it.  I think it will work now.


On 3/4/17, 9:58 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:

>I think I never ran maven in typedefs.  But they are swc not app so use a
>different mojo?
>Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>From: Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
>Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2017 9:39:26 AM
>To: dev@flex.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [FlexJS][Maven] JS-only
>Hi Alex,
>So I switched to the dual branch and built the compiler without problems.
>When building the typedefs however I am getting the exact same error in
>the JS module.
>I guess I will have to adjust the was the typedefs are built. I can see
>that the AS code is being generated correctly, but that is no longer
>compiled to an SWC.
>Any ideas? I’ll have a look at the asjs module right away.
>Am 04.03.17, 18:23 schrieb "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com>:
>    On 3/4/17, 1:11 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
>    >Hi Alex,
>    >
>    >If you have a flexjs module, that produces just the JavaScript, you
>    >to configure another plugin to pack that up as a war archive as maven
>    >doesn’t support directories as build artifacts.
>    >So you would need to add that (see the output of the archetype for
>    >JS applications). In the case of the other native application that
>    >shouldn’t produce an SWF, just set
>    >“<outputJavaScript>true</outputJavaScript>” … If you like, I
>    >you a hand on this … would I need just the dual branch of the asjs or
>    >from all modules?
>    It would be great if you would deal with this.  You will need the dual
>    branch from flex-falcon and flex-asjs,  Flex-typedefs doesn't have a
>    branch.
>    I think the WAR package is already in the process since if you have a
>    it appears some later step creates the WAR.  I'm assuming that
>because the
>    SWF artifact doesn't exist the build fails before getting to the WAR
>    My hope is that folks can easily switch between generating just SWF
>    output, just JS output, or both.  There is a new compiler.targets
>    that drives that, and I've taken out the outputJavaScript option.
>    that's not the Maven way, but this way folks don't have to configure a
>    second execution with the outputJavaScript option on.
>    Thoughts?
>    -Alex

View raw message